Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,839
The Liverpool games were shocking. The difference now is that we have VAR.Ramos wasn't sent off only booked deliberately to miss 2nd leg. How many decisions went against us in both legs of the dippers game last season let alone the coach fiasco!
If those games had VAR and they still:
- gave their offside goal
- disallowed our onside goal
- didn't give the Sterling penalty
- Disallowed the goal that was passed back by their player
Then we could say they were outright cheating. With VAR there is no chance that would happen.
Also worth mentioning that VAR might have ruled out our first goal in the second leg for Sterling push on VVD (not saying it was a foul, just that it was contentious).
Those games were shocking and were either incredibly incompetent refereeing or bent. The introduction of VAR makes me think it's the former though, and I don't see why UEFA would be keen to introduce something that clearly hampers their efforts to control results?
Also, my original point is about us v Schalke. You could argue Liverpool are a bigger club and a bigger draw for UEFA's later stages. You cannot give me one solid motive that UEFA may have to encourage them to aid Schalke through ahead of us.
Coach fiasco is irrelevant to UEFA. Completely down to Merseyside police. Surely no one assumes UEFA were involved in that?