No, it's just ugly. But I can't see how this is a sign of a bad attitude. Most football pros are dressed similar ugly.
No, it's just ugly. But I can't see how this is a sign of a bad attitude. Most football pros are dressed similar ugly.
I was joking mate. He gets reported on in Germany similar to Raheem in the UK!!
This jacket stinks of bad attitude
https://m.bild.de/sport/fussball/na...-treffpunkt-60733040,view=amp.bildMobile.html
Too true. Get on it, Pep. Either sell the cnut or get Raz to take him down to Primark.
Fair call by Pep to take Sane off against Swansea, didn’t show enough desire considering he has not started many games since the turn of the year.
Lock up your sheep Sane is about.
Don’t farmers spray paint their sheep with fluorescent colours? Should be able to identify where he rustled this one from.
Where does it say he was crap against Swansea on here?people who keep saying sane was crap against Swansea and she have been dragged off I say bollox if you watched the game you would have seen he got injured in the first few minutes of the game and never got over it and that showed in the game fuck all to do with being crap.
I wouldn’t know about sticking things up arses. Perhaps you do?They also stick pitchforks up the arses of rags...
Have you not seen ‘of mice and men’, Lennie?
I wouldn’t know about sticking things up arses. Perhaps you do?
Fair call by Pep to take Sane off against Swansea, didn’t show enough desire considering he has not started many games since the turn of the year.
2-0 down against a Championship team and Sterling on the bench. One of Mahrez or Sane to come off for Sterling seems a logical thought. Neither tore it up against Swansea. What’s not fair for that change to happen? According to Bluemoon Sane is worth £100m and Mahrez worth small change. Which of these is the bigger disappointment against Swansea.The only reason he took him off was because he wanted Zinchenko and Sterling down that side. If he was taking somebody off based on their first half performance he would have took Mahrez off.
Sane got an injury in the first half,tried to run it off and went off,mahrez was the worse of the two but pep wanted to do other things,why have you got such a downer on sane?2-0 down against a Championship team and Sterling on the bench. One of Mahrez or Sane to come off for Sterling seems a logical thought. Neither tore it up against Swansea. What’s not fair for that change to happen? According to Bluemoon Sane is worth £100m and Mahrez worth small change. Which of these is the bigger disappointment against Swansea.
Why you trolling me again.Sane got an injury in the first half,tried to run it off and went off,mahrez was the worse of the two but pep wanted to do other things,why have you got such a downer on sane?
I don't even remember you,i don't troll by the wayWhy you trolling me again.
I state It fair for Pep to take off Sane and now I am having a downer on him apparently....Unbelievable. I guess some Bluemooners like to just pick an argument.
I didn’t say little desire, just not enough. Not enough to make him vulnerable to being subbed.I don't even remember you,i don't troll by the way
You said it was fair to take him off as he showed little desire,you seem to have a downer hence my question,if you can't take a simple question then put me on ignore
2-0 down against a Championship team and Sterling on the bench. One of Mahrez or Sane to come off for Sterling seems a logical thought. Neither tore it up against Swansea. What’s not fair for that change to happen? According to Bluemoon Sane is worth £100m and Mahrez worth small change. Which of these is the bigger disappointment against Swansea.