Fine. Just don't complain when the likes of Danny Murphy give out the advice that other players should let us know were in a game, and get physical with us. Next time someone leaves one on KDB, and we lose him for eight weeks, then that's no problem. Just part and parcel of the modern game.
Unless it’s Puncheon on KDB last season when the forum was up in arms about players never getting sent off against City. I don’t see how anyone can think one of those was red and one wasn’t. I don’t care which way people see it, both yellows or both red, but they should be viewed the same. To be fair, you might well have thought Puncheon should have only got yellow, which is fair enough. For what it’s worth, on an anonymous Internet forum, I thought Puncheon and Sane should both have been red.I think you need to watch it again. It is a dirty trick, but it's never a sending off, not in a million years.
Would you have said that had the roles been reversed ? I bet you and many more would have been baying for blood from the ref.
Unless it’s Puncheon on KDB last season when the forum was up in arms about players never getting sent off against City. I don’t see how anyone can think one of those was red and one wasn’t. I don’t care which way people see it, both yellows or both red, but they should be viewed the same. To be fair, you might well have thought Puncheon should have only got yellow, which is fair enough. For what it’s worth, on an anonymous Internet forum, I thought Puncheon and Sane should both have been red.
Totally agree Pudge, Sane briefly saw red and could have seen red
If you say so. Imagine that Lowton had done it to Sane then. Would you be on here telling all those clamouring for red that they were bang out of order it was only ever a yellow? I suspect you wouldn’t......Puncheon was lunging and out of control, Sané was not. It's a ridiculous comparison.
If you say so. Imagine that Lowton had done it to Sane then. Would you be on here telling all those clamouring for red that they were bang out of order it was only ever a yellow? I suspect you wouldn’t......
Whilst agreeing it was stupid and petulant (you have to admire the sneer) I don't see how it could be a straight red wasn't reckless, violent, preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity or likely to injure so under what rule could he have been dismissed?If you say so. Imagine that Lowton had done it to Sane then. Would you be on here telling all those clamouring for red that they were bang out of order it was only ever a yellow? I suspect you wouldn’t......
At the time I didn`t think Kompanys tackle was a yellow,so imagine my surprise when I saw it back on the TV.He was very lucky.However Sane was stupid,never intending to go for the ball,but the man.He was very fortunate and some refs could have sent him off.It was a cynical tackle.It's not a red, it wasn't dangerous and it was not out of control. It was a yellow. It was no worse, in fact not as bad a Lawton's foul on him when Sané left him for dead.
Listen, in an ideal world, where everything is perfect, he doesn't do it, but I understand why he did it and don't particularly have an issue with it. If David Silva or Fernandinho does it, no one cares. Because some perceive Sané to have an 'attitude' it's big news.
Kompany should have seen red, a ridiculous tackle & decision.
He should have brought the ball fiwn away from Lennon and gone back to Ederson. He was all over the place.