Lescott [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blueglen30 said:
Remember this also people Toure is away for up to 6 weeks come December a crucial time of the year to lose a first choice defender

Excellent point. It is clear we need two centre halves. Ned and Toure shoudn't play together, they need an organizer who is excellent in the air beside them, so we need two dominant central defenders, Lescott and one more.
 
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
bobmcfc said:
we should get hangeland and alves aswell.lescott has trouble with his knee and if toure gets injured dunne and tbh will be their cover !!! (yikes) i shudder at the thought

What about Kompany and Ned ? Id use them as cover first
kompany is injured and neds fitness isn't always a dead cert
 
Blueglen30 said:
Remember this also people Toure is away for up to 6 weeks come December a crucial time of the year to lose a first choice defender

You can lose any player anywhere at any time for up to 6 weeks or longer with injury, hence a squad and cover such as Ned, Kompany, Barry (if need be), Dunne, TBH, Mcgivern, Mee.
 
Good point, what is the use of buying quality players to have the good work undone by an average player like Dunne, now before anyone has a pop at me, I understand he is captain and was player of the season four times, but lets be honest who else did we have at the time.... Barton?, yes Dunne use to look good in a very average team.

If we play him at CB this season we might as well give the other team a 1-0 headstart, last night he jumped into challenges again, he cannot be be blamed alone obviously with TBH playing that was always going to go wrong but for Hughes to appear to have so much faith in Dunne makes me laugh, look at the corner he gave away when he didn't need to, Given gave him an earfull.

We need to make getting a CB in our number 1 aim by tomorrow so that we can ensure they atleast get a run out in the match against Celtic.
 
bobmcfc said:
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
What about Kompany and Ned ? Id use them as cover first
kompany is injured and neds fitness isn't always a dead cert

But its ok for you to use a hypothetical Lescott and Toure injury ? You only want to fit the circumstances to your own argument, Poor form Bob I expect better of you ;o)
 
The club have said only 1 more signing which would be the 6 mentioned at the start of the window (not including Taylor he was unforseen) which is clearly going to be a defender imo it should be and needs to be 2 so we will never need to rely on TBH and Dunne
 
Blueglen30 said:
we could get Hangeland for half the money Lescott still aint put in a transfer request we need to get the defence sorted quick if we have to rely on Dunne and TBH we really are in the shit

I think he is going for lescott because he is good cover for left back, if bridge does not improve on last season i can see our back four being; Richards/Zabaleta, Toure, Neddy, Lescott.
 
Blueglen30 said:
The club have said only 1 more signing which would be the 6 mentioned at the start of the window (not including Taylor he was unforseen) which is clearly going to be a defender imo it should be and needs to be 2 so we will never need to rely on TBH and Dunne

The club have never said there was a specific limit on the number of players we would sign, there was a loose target but it has always been made clear that if the right players are available to improve the squad we will be interested.
 
thats fair comment kippax blue but we really need a centre half and if push really came to shove barry could drop in there
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.