BamberBridgeBlue
Well-Known Member
I sang it. I know what I meant when I sang it. The litany of transgressions have already been listed. I was aware it was a United song, but I wasn’t aware of it was about Hillsborough. Because it isn’t just about Hillsborough, it’s Hillsborough in relation to Heysel, (Heysel never happened).I didn't twist anything. You admit it's not a song invented by City fans. It's a United song, that got widespread condemnation from clubs, supporters groups and the league for being about Hillsborough years before anyone at City sang it.
You cannot pretend none of that happened, you can't ignore that history and decide to adopt a controversial song and suddenly decide it's about something else and then not only that, but get upset that people think you're singing a song for the reason it's in the press and controversial before you picked it up - and get angry that the club condemns it and it draws criticism from the press.
You and @Chris in London and everyone else can all keep singing it and getting angry, but the club is going to keep condemning you, the league is going to take increasingly strong action and the papers will keep calling it a Hillsborough chant as they have done since it was started back in 2012 and long before anyone to do with City sang it.
But you insist you know exactly what was going on in the mind of thousands of City fans? Have you had your God complex long? If you can indeed read my thoughts then read this.
Got it?