Both excellent posts.
As Blue Mist said, theres no grey areas with them. If I didn't condemn it, then I was effectively condoning it. And that's another part of it I find offensive. There's no middle ground you can find an element of agreement with them on.
I've bent over backwards to understand their point of view but they don't give an inch from their entrenched position, with no consideration or acknowledgment of the alternative view. This guy wasn't prepared to contemplate the view that people sing it while fully understanding the issues around Hillsborough and being fully in their camp on the matter.
His unwavering view was that everyone singing it blamed Liverpool fans for the events and mocking the victims. And that's typical. No one on their side seems to be prepared to engage in an open-minded debate.
And, as my learned friend @gordondaviesmoustache has pointed out, that's a large part of the problem. If I was someone like Spirit of Shankly chair Joe Blott, or the clunks media team, I'd be looking to sit down with other clubs, their fan groups and local media to explain calmly the background and accept that many see it and sing it as having no connotation with Hillsborough. Then explain united fans' use of it and thr publication of the HIP report and how those events could be seen to be linked.
People might have sympathy with that view, if they were treated as intelligent and mature, rather than being insulted by demands from a group they see as entitled and arrogant.
those last 3 pictures are pre Hilsborough tbf so irrelevent ttlo the present opinion of the club and fans.
plus Liverpool was always a tory/liberal voting city up untill the mid 80s, the romanticism and myrh they created during the councils millitant tendancy period and the dockers strike, led to them becomig a lot more pro-labour locally and nationally, the scouse not english thing is a quite modern day thing too.
Pictures of the 83/84 team with thatcher has no impact or conection on post 89 Liverpool and the chants in question
The scen game yeah pretty hypocritical of them
though I would say they are firmly an establishment club and as such treated with a cannot do wrong attitude by the media
I see you’ve met as many of the red gobshites as I have, they’ll be loving all this.And they’ll claim any new song is a direct descendant of ATV etc, as well as any wording used in it, for most it’s about their own moral compass being brought into question, and empowering the scousers, as well as holding them to account for their gigantic rap sheet, if I sang it I’d know the reasons behind it (too many to mention) and it isn’t connected to Hillsborough. The sheer fact they have weaponised the term ‘stadium disasters’ means Heysel is out of bounds also, what next ? Words/terminology being scrubbed from the Oxford dictionary
But that would mean a level of agreement that the chant isn’t about Hillsborough. They already know it isn’t but claim it is.His unwavering view was that everyone singing it blamed Liverpool fans for the events and mocking the victims. And that's typical. No one on their side seems to be prepared to engage in an open-minded debate.
He's only a poor little scouser.................
Now we are in troubleSo I hit him with a brick…..
And now he doesn’t sing anymore.Now we are in trouble