halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,079
If it’s conflating why is it not about Heysel?
And it's been conflated with about another 100 examples of "victimhood" since. To claim it's just a Hillsborough reference is disingenuous.
Last night we heard more examples: yes it's bad that objects were thrown but we were the victims because they started it with Hillsborough chants (self-perpetuating victimhood), or Feed the Scousers chants .... We are the victims because it's poverty shaming us as Liverpool is the only place in England that has been poorly treated (factually incorrect victimhood).
The club do it too: yes coins were thrown, but we are the victims because they started it with Hillsborough sings and vandalism (self-inflicted AND suspiciously convenient victimhood), yes they have won 4/5 but we are the victims because they can spend what they want and we can't compete (just completely bollocks victimhood).
And recently, chants about the late Queen were only because we were victims of the royal family who orchestrated the campaign against us about Hillsborough (paranoid victimhood). IRA chants were because we are the victims of anti-Irish sentiment, being the only city that has a large Irish community (factually incorrect and, really, honestly, desperate-stretch victimhood) .
All these just from that last few weeks. Multiply that over 30 years and you get why people don't buy into that mentality any more, and why it grates. I doubt there are many football fans in England who disagree that Liverpool fans suffer from a victim complex.
They just take these victim positions because it's a way of self-validating their own offensive behaviour.
A read for our visiting Liverpool friends:
Victim Mentality: How We Hold Ourselves Back by Blaming Others
When you give up responsibility for your life, that’s not all you give up. Learn the impact victim mentality has on your life, and how to overcome it.
www.betterup.com