Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,139
That's the thing about yesterday, in that you can look at it from a number of different angles and come to entirely different conclusions. I simply don't agree with your assertion that we controlled it however. Liverpool allowed us to have the ball and sat back knowing we were essentially toothless. So you could equally say they controlled it. You could say we controlled the second half against Leicester but did we really? We certainly had more of the ball consistently in the second half but was there a time that you thought "It's just a matter of time before we score?" because I didn't.
I totally disagree with the notion that the team who doesn't have the ball has control of a game, but that's just my opinion.
I'm really struggling with the idea that losing control of the football is in any way a good thing. In fact, it frustrates the hell out of me when City get a goal and then go on the defensive, far sooner that you keep control of the ball and go and get the second to kill the game off.
It's small teams that get a goal up and then defend for their lives which is essentially what Liverpool did. I took that a massive complement but made the result even more frustrating as I know we are a better team than Liverpool.