Liverpool Takeover (Merged)

Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

The takeover cannot go through.
The Liverpoo fans havent even got to the stage of wearing green and yellow scarves yet.
That will be when we know they are serious.
 
Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

Peston predicts administration, albeit fleeting.

[quote
Broughton: 'I have the power to sell Liverpool'
Robert Peston | 14:08 UK time, Wednesday, 6 October 2010
I've just interviewed Martin Broughton, chairman of Liverpool since April.

And what struck me was his confidence that he can sell the club from under its owners, Tom Hicks and George Gillett.

He told me that when he took the post of chairman, he received explicit undertakings that he was in charge of selling the club - and that Mr Hicks and Mr Gillett surrendered any right to block a sale to a bidder he deemed most suitable.


Those undertakings will now be tested in court, probably in the middle of next week.

But bankers tell me that if the courts rule against the transfer of Liverpool FC to the new ownership of John Henry and New England Sports Ventures, the sale will still probably go through - although via the ungainly mechanism of Royal Bank of Scotland putting Liverpool into administration (see my earlier post on how this would work).

So it looks like the parent company of the Boston Red Sox will be the proprietor of the Liverpool FC.

It is proposing to pay £300m, of which £200m would pay off the longer term bank debt provided by Royal Bank of Scotland and Wachovia of the US (three quarters of that £200m goes to RBS).

Another £40m would pay off other creditors, such as the local council.

And £60m would stay in the business as debt secured on the stadium plus working capital facilities.

Not even a brass farthing will go to messrs Hicks and Gillett, which means they stand to lose the £140m they've put into the club - and it's why they will do all they can to frustrate the deal.

If, as seems likely, the deal goes through one way or another, Liverpool will once again have relatively modest debts - around £60m -which, as I've said, should feel like something of a liberation.

And Mr Broughton told me he was confident that the new owner wouldn't simply take money out by foisting new borrowings on the club as and when financial markets recover sufficiently - though there aren't any cast iron guarantees to that effect.

Nor has he extracted a binding commitment to build the new Stanley Park stadium. But Mr Broughton pointed to the track record of John Henry in developing sporting facilities in an imaginative way.

Mr Broughton believes that Mr Henry wants to own Liverpool for what the Kop would see as the right reasons - namely to turn it again into a winning club on the field, as the sine qua non of commercial success.

Mr Henry's record at the Boston Red Sox - which has won two World Series under his ownership after decades of ignominy and failure - would make that a plausible assertion.

But although globalisation is increasingly a phenomenon in sport as well in finance, there are still huge cultural differences between sports clubs in different countries. Mr Henry will find much about Liverpool FC unfamiliar, even alien.

So perhaps astutely, Mr Broughton refused to make any prediction of when silverware would once more grace the Liverpool trophy cabinet, to follow the silver raining into Royal Bank of Scotland's coffers.[/quote]
 
Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

apparently they have invested $50 million while they have been at red sox!.........thats about £10 Million year!.....well that's goner get em up the table................
 
Re: Liverpool Red Sox

The balance of power in baseball is much more spread out than in the PL. The Yankees outspend everybody by a lot but have only won two titles since 2000. There are eight playoff teams and this year and only three of them are in the top ten in salary. Three are ranked 11-20 and two are in the bottom ten (Rays at 21 and Rangers at 27).

The Red Sox are #2 in spending and have a very good team but they were decimated by injuries this year. They'll almost certainly make the postseason next year. One of their first moves was hiring wunderkind Theo Epstein who built them into a perrenial contender. They'll probably do the same for Liverpool.
 
Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

FryingPanFire.jpg
 
Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

projectriver said:
fbloke said:
I agree to a point and thats what I was suggesting with the statement that they have been outmanoeuvred here.

However there is a chance that H an G could prove that the process and decisions made by Broughton were more about regaining the moneys owed to RBS than a fair price for the club.

I would not stop l laughing for a week if Hicks pulled a masterstroke and paid off the debt or brought out a new deal with a much higher value.

I'm not sure how H&G can claim they have been prejudiced. The clubs been for sale in a global public auction for a long long time and no fully funded offers have been made. They have run out of time. And they signed the undertaking - nobody forced them (although they were badly advised). Then again I suspect they had no choice at that time as it would have been a condition of RBS rolling the debt.

Pretty much had no choice but to sign the undertaking as this was the only way RBS would reschedule the debt. H&G effectively gambled by signing away control of the club in the hope of selling the club at a profit before the new deadline day which is 6th Oct (with 9 days grace).

Short of H&G coming up with a buyer in the next 9 days then they are screwed and no one is going to offer the £600m that they want when you can buy the business for £300m.

The only question remains is do H&G hang on like grim death in the vain hope that someone is stupid enough to meet their valuation when the main creditor values the business at £300m and is 9 days away from having outright as opposed to proxy control.

Personally I hope that the deal does through as is it secures Liverpool's future (well for the short term anyway) with owners who do not have the deep pockets to invest the way ADUG are investing in City. I just hope they keep Roy in place as he is doing a bang up job.
 
Re: Liverpool Red Sox

buckshot said:
The balance of power in baseball is much more spread out than in the PL. The Yankees outspend everybody by a lot but have only won two titles since 2000. There are eight playoff teams and this year and only three of them are in the top ten in salary. Three are ranked 11-20 and two are in the bottom ten (Rays at 21 and Rangers at 27).

The Red Sox are #2 in spending and have a very good team but they were decimated by injuries this year. They'll almost certainly make the postseason next year. One of their first moves was hiring wunderkind Theo Epstein who built them into a perrenial contender. They'll probably do the same for Liverpool.

Hire Theo Epstien!!!

Fuckin hell, I'm already shaking in my boots.
 
Re: Liverpool Takeover Imminent?

Hilarious, the guy bought the second biggest franchise to the Yankees on the cheap invested *uck all (even after stating he would build a new stadium), he inherited a good team, infact a great team, but a good portion of the big game players have gone, the yankees are now back on top. Remember there a no transfer fees, just golden handshakes to the players as they come and go and the passing over of contracts. So the dippers can expect zero player investment, because he simply hasn't got the money, or the desire to do anything other than sell it at a profit, probably within 6 months. Good business for Henry as he will probably make £150 million, maybe £200 million in 6 months and fuck of back to the USA and maybe the Red Sox will now get the new stadium.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.