Re: Liverpool Thread 2012
Sorry. I wrote my response in two separate posts, but I'd do understand the "negotiation fees". In the end the form of transfer is different. But baseball clubs still take on debt and relinquish debt as they do here. The numbers aren't as massive but they do exist. As for moneyball, it should be noted that it dates back to the early 80s. But it was never properly put into form until much later at Oakland Athletics.
The question was will Henry spend til he wins. The answer is yes. The man needs to win.
Matty said:alky313 said:Matty said:There are no transfer fees in American sports, it's all wages and agents fees. The top Baseball player reached free agency this summer, Albert Pujols, he signed a 10 year deal with the Los Angeles Angels worth $254!!! That's approx £160m, or £16m a season, so just slightly more than £300k a week! And that's without considering the huge sum his agent will have got for negotiating that deal.
Not as much tax on it either. But there are 'transfer fees' especially in the case of Daisuke Matsuzaka. The term is rather tough to get into in American sports.
These numbers are big. But most cities have only maybe two clubs.
Matsuzaka was a different type of deal as he was moving from the Japanese Baseball League to the MLB. In that scenario teams must pay the "selling" club a fee, normally set in the millions of dollars. Movements between MLB clubs don't have transfer fees like we'd view them, they are normally trades or players moving under free agency.
Sorry. I wrote my response in two separate posts, but I'd do understand the "negotiation fees". In the end the form of transfer is different. But baseball clubs still take on debt and relinquish debt as they do here. The numbers aren't as massive but they do exist. As for moneyball, it should be noted that it dates back to the early 80s. But it was never properly put into form until much later at Oakland Athletics.
The question was will Henry spend til he wins. The answer is yes. The man needs to win.