Matty said:
Liverpool's defensive frailties are caused, in equal parts, by the personnel involved and the tactics employed. Flanagan is young, unproven, and liable to errors given he's just starting out in the game. Johnson is a liability defensively, Skrtel can't defend without trying to rip off an opponents shirt, Agger is decent, Sakho looks quick but positionally naive. When you combine that with a set of tactics which involves high energy pressure early on, then you over expose your defence, and you run the legs out of your midfield too early leaving them unable to provide sufficient cover later in games. Rodgers needs to address both of these issues, his signings so far haven't helped the personnel, and I can't see him changing his tactical philosophy to address that issue either. Liverpool will be in a fight for a Champion's League spot this season, but I can't see them pushing the likes of City and Chelsea anything like they did last year. I see us and Chelsea being the top 2, in some order, then the next 3 being made up of Liverpool, Arsenal and United, again in some order.
Yes, correct. It's half personnel, half style. The best examples are the Stoke and Crystal Palace 5-3 and 3-3 games. I think the Can signing is with a view of him eventually being some sort of hard man in midfield. By the way, about this, here's the elephant in the room: Allen/Henderson/Lucas and
Gerrard/Coutinho/Henderson. Which midfield offers better balance? Many of us are increasingly voicing what must be done. I hope Rodgers is brave enough to do it.
As far as defenders, Sakho will turn out fine, I think Rodgers wants Lovren to be his partner....but man, that price. Anyway, if we have the money and can afford it I'll let the suits worry about it.
Agger is made of glass, will probably be sold but 1 year ago we could've gotten 20M+ for him, now 10M at most. Skrtel should stay as cover.