Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,107
Maybe.
But my brother and a friend I know support Liverpool here in the states.
Goddamn it all - I owe one of them a burrito for betting that City would win out against Liverpool in the CL!
That said - neither condone the minority holligans at Liverpool.
So enlighten me - yes a minory part of the Liverpool fan base are criminals - yes, criminals.
And yes, as I've stated above, Liverpool need to do much more as a club to condemn this.
So.. why is it that I "clearly don't understand Liverpool as a club or a fanbase. So much so, you've completely missed the point of my post."
Because they thrive on misery and excuses pal. They love the "unlucky" more than the actual win.
They appreciate Steven Gerrard as a plucky local lad who was hard done by, never winning the premier league despite him being the greatest ever midfielder in the league in their eyes. Completely ignoring the fact he grew up an Everton fan, handed in a transfer request and only removed it when moving to Chelsea because local thugs threatened him, and he was made look good by various foreign players in the side over the years, from Xabi Alonso, to Dietmar Hammann, to Torres, to Suarez and many more in between. A media trained dirtbag who has actively gotten several managers fired over the years, most recently Rodgers and Hodgson before that. They've picked and chosen facts and mixed them with mythology to make Gerrard out to be something he never was.
They endlessly defend disgusting actions. From racism by one of their players, to bottling opponents buses. It's not just a minority of fans. It's in the clubs DNA. Just watch the former players(all on payroll) endlessly be interviewed to spew the official line.("Suarez wasn't racist", "City's arab money is ruining football" , "Sterling is disgusting and a cancer for wanting to leave Liverpool" and many more)
Their people have an underlying hatred of all things City since we were taken over, and it's pure racism at it's base. It's a classic case of "someone foreign is doing better than us" and the media are more than happy to peddle that line as it fits with their brexit/xenophobistic agenda. Liverpool fans can't even comprehend this and just think it's consensus, when it's just using them to convey a narrative they don't comprehend.
They again, re-write a narrative blissfully ignorant of it attacking themselves. No team spews "City have no histree" line more than Liverpool. The actual fact is they had no history of note until the relatively recent 1970's. So if any club in the premier league has no history, it's Liverpool. "City are a sugar daddies club", when in fact Liverpool benefitted from huge financial doping in the 1970's by the Littlewood's family, who ploughed money into them to make them relevant so the lower classes there would waste money on gambling in Littlewood's Pools. Again, they don't even understand they are the most guilty of the charges they throw out there.
So back to last Sat.
They got what they wanted.
They wanted an excuse.
More than a trophy, this lot feed off the victim narrative. They were robbed. They were hard done by. Karius.
They haven't, for a single second thought that Real would have beaten them with or without Salah. I'm not saying they would have, merely that Liverpool don't care. They have an excuse. Therefore, they are happy.
I'd suggest you go and look into the "history" of that club before defending them, you are showing yourself as unaware of what they truly are. You'll learn plenty from reading this thread going forward and if you truly follow City, you'll see it for yourself going forward as Liverpool's hatred of us is only getting started.