Liverpool thread 2019/20

[sam 1980]

If they fall short, their American owners should get a lot of criticism. They seem to be in it for the money, rather than the glory.

That squad as it is is dmagerously reliant on 3 forwards for goals and assists. There must be a high probability of injury / decline in form with the amount of football they've played.

Typical American owners once they have a bit of success they hold off on spending until they have no other choice but to spend some serious cash. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of their big names is sold until they heavily invest again.

 

[Edward Deadwood]

Typical American owners once they have a bit of success they hold off on spending until they have no other choice but to spend some serious cash. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of their big names is sold until they heavily invest again.

Typical American owners once they have a bit of success they hold off on spending until they have no other choice but to spend some serious cash. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of their big names is sold until they heavily invest again.

I just heard that Liverpool came top in a poll of Sunday Mirror readers as the sexiest fans in the Premier League.

Some people might say that merely damns them with faint praise. But let’s be fair, you can’t really argue against the permanence of their iconic hair styles and tashing good looks.

 

[lancs blue]

Signed Harvey Elliott from Fulham, presumably for a fee set by tribunal as he's 16.

They must be hoping he develops like Raz so we can pay them £80m for him in a few years.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49143438

 

[BLUE THUNDER]

Interesting how he didn't include Utd in the 4 teams who spend as they please.
F*ng cock he is.
Did he forget to mention that Dippers and Rags have a higher wage bill than us ?

Its a an insurance policy as an excuse when they fail to beat us in the league again.

 

[Ribchester]

Welcome to Fantasy island lol

 

[everythingchangesbutblue]

Liverpool/Klopp is recieving criticism about the lack of spending, after last year's spending spree. But FSG business strategy is completely different from that of (for example) Manchester City.

Like he said, it's not really criticism, is just stating a fact.

City Football Group use Manchester City to spear head a long term strategy for global domination, and their business strategy go beyond Manchester City. They see no problem investing large amount of money now, with the potential of a much higher reward in the future. FSG is using a different strategy with much less risk taking and no other ambition than to make the individual company (Liverpool FC) grow.

What I would take offense to, if I was a City fan, is to be grouped together with PSG. PSG is a really strange project while City Football Group are on target to achieving their very ambitious goals.

Your talking absolute spinning shite. The truth is simple and it's this...

City reinvest all their money back into the team while your owners pocket yours.

Everyone jokes about the Coutinho money but without it it would be obvious to everyone how much fsg pocket.

 

[hertsblue]

Ah but he said he would never spend large money didnt he, and has spent the last 2 years with highest spends and wages.
Just look at the fees they have paid:
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-liverpool/transferrekorde/verein/31

Least they can now boast the We have the Youngest ever PL player trophy

 

[Bodicoteblue]

Interesting how he didn't include Utd in the 4 teams who spend as they please.
F*ng cock he is.
Did he forget to mention that Dippers and Rags have a higher wage bill than us ?

Its a an insurance policy as an excuse when they fail to beat us in the league again.

With, of course, the implication that their shortcomings will be all down to our financial ‘malfeasance’.
Klopp didn’t come up with this all by himself, there will have been messages passed down from above.
I’m sick to death of explaining the facts to assorted fans of other clubs, but I think it will go on for a long time yet.

 

[jitsubluedan]

Typical American owners once they have a bit of success they hold off on spending until they have no other choice but to spend some serious cash. It wouldn’t surprise me if one of their big names is sold until they heavily invest again.

Spot on. Was ‘discussing’ City winning the league with one of my rag brother-in-laws’s just after they’d signed van Persie. His view was that City had done utd a favour by winning the league the previous season as it meant they had to buy a world-class striker. Until we became a threat, the last time they’d done that was with van nistlrooy.

He commented - in a very matter of fact way and with no rancour, that Arabs are prepared to spend their money whereas Yanks will only do it if they have to.

Liverpool spent big last year because they had to - as they have recently won the UCL they think they can rest on their laurels for now. Revenue for the scum increased again last year and woowar was on record saying that they didn’t need to win trophies to do this - much to the chagrin of thee bbc business reporter.

Long may these business philosophies continue!

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Liverpool/Klopp is recieving criticism about the lack of spending, after last year's spending spree. But FSG business strategy is completely different from that of (for example) Manchester City.

Like he said, it's not really criticism, is just stating a fact.

City Football Group use Manchester City to spear head a long term strategy for global domination, and their business strategy go beyond Manchester City. They see no problem investing large amount of money now, with the potential of a much higher reward in the future. FSG is using a different strategy with much less risk taking and no other ambition than to make the individual company (Liverpool FC) grow.

What I would take offense to, if I was a City fan, is to be grouped together with PSG. PSG is a really strange project while City Football Group are on target to achieving their very ambitious goals.

He is just becoming pathetic in continually referring to the spending of other clubs.

Dippers have spent plenty to get where they are , and chucking huge wages about too.

He's always having a dig at City because despite the CL win, he hasn't managed the PL , and the dippers will likely have to get past City again this season.
Bitterness and jealousy are typical dipper traits coupled with entitlement , and Klopp is the perfect manager because he buys into the cult ethos.