bluwes
Well-Known Member
Notice you have City as your second team. Maybe stick to your first choiceThis deal stinks of city's desperation in the market, over a barrel springs to mind with our trousers down
Notice you have City as your second team. Maybe stick to your first choiceThis deal stinks of city's desperation in the market, over a barrel springs to mind with our trousers down
Pretty much sums it up.Correct so as we can trust the club not to be reckless or negligent there’s not need to worry about the price or give a fuck.
88m is pushing it a more sensible fee would in my opinion be 60-70 mil but i underatand how inflated the market is, if they want over 90 mil walk away i say.I dont care too much for the fee if the club are happy to pay it but i`m 99.9% sure we wont have bid £88m and even more sure west ham wont have rejected!
Crazy fee and one City won’t pay based on how we conduct ourselves in the market. If the price does not reflect the players quality walk away. My only hope here is that both clubs seem to have a good relationship and the hammers may want 1/2 of our lads.I dont care too much for the fee if the club are happy to pay it but i`m 99.9% sure we wont have bid £88m and even more sure west ham wont have rejected!
Off topic but wondering if you still keen in touch with spanish Dave ?Notice you have City as your second team. Maybe stick to your first choice
So not walk away at £88 mill , walk away at £90 mill. How about £89.25 mill? Guessing arbitrary figures we will or won’t pay is pointless.88m is pushing it a more sensible fee would in my opinion be 60-70 mil but i underatand how inflated the market is, if they want over 90 mil walk away i say.
ShiteThis deal stinks of city's desperation in the market, over a barrel springs to mind with our trousers down
Hahahaha.This deal stinks of city's desperation in the market, over a barrel springs to mind with our trousers down