tommybooth
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 5,291
The rags stumped up 27 for camel gob many moons ago.
tommybooth said:The rags stumped up 27 for camel gob many moons ago.
MihaiCity said:tommybooth said:The rags stumped up 27 for camel gob many moons ago.
wasn't 34M???
£27m in 2002 = approx. £37m nowLoveCity said:MihaiCity said:tommybooth said:The rags stumped up 27 for camel gob many moons ago.
wasn't 34M???
It was £34m in the end, it was on their accounts.
LoveCity said:MihaiCity said:tommybooth said:The rags stumped up 27 for camel gob many moons ago.
wasn't 34M???
It was £34m in the end, it was on their accounts.
Davs 19 said:The words 'Luke Shaw' & 'Thirty Million Pounds' shouldn't be in the same sentence unless it also includes the words 'isn't worth'.
A very promising player but £30 millions worth ? Not even close for me.
FantasyIreland said:LoveCity said:MihaiCity said:wasn't 34M???
It was £34m in the end, it was on their accounts.
Remind me how that deal ended up looking....?
Agreed.Proelia said:Ricardo rodriguez is far better then shaw and could be snipped up for a third of the price
ManCitizens. said:Davs 19 said:The words 'Luke Shaw' & 'Thirty Million Pounds' shouldn't be in the same sentence unless it also includes the words 'isn't worth'.
A very promising player but £30 millions worth ? Not even close for me.
If he's our left back for 10 years+ is he not worth the £3 million per season?