journolud
Well-Known Member
It sounds extremely unlikely. In the first instance do you suppose that the use of Calpol was the first time they tried to calm Maddie down?
That being the case I suspect it unlikely that she suffered a reaction having presumably not suffered one previously. They were doctors so again, I would have thought they were in a position to do something about it.
Are there many Calpol related deaths that you are aware of?
Let us suppose that she did suffer a fatal reaction to a relatively benign childrens medicine that is used worldwide by (I presume) many millions of infants. Why on earth would the parents first reaction be "Bloody hell Gerry, she's only gone and karked it, let's dump the body and embark on a massive cover up"
The more I type, the less plausible it all sounds. But that said, now't so queer as folk so on balance yes that's almost certainly exactly what happened.
Whatever actually occurred, nothing about this is ordinairy. Every option explored seems really far fetched. I wonder if we shall ever find out.
Calpol isn't a sedative, it's just paracetamol. At the time of Maddies disappearance there was a children's medine called medised which combined paracetamol with a sedating antihistamine. This was discontinued in the UK. It's not impossible that a child sedated with medised could be disoriented and dizzy on waking, could fall and hurt or kill themselves. There are safe prescribed limits for all medications but not that unusual for doctors to go off license with above recommended doses.
Over the counter sleeping tablets like nytol are basically antihistamine tablets no longer in current use because they are so sedating.
I'm not advocating that this is what happened because I struggle with the thought of any parent being so calculating if they had unwittingly caused the death of one of their children but it is possible.