Blue Haze
Well-Known Member
teddykgb said:Some of you are outright rabid on naming people "inners" and "outers"
I'd have a hard time saying whether Pellegrini is an upgrade on Mancini, I'd have to watch him manage our squad for two seasons to know the answer, which is really why picking a manager is so damned difficult.
Maybe moving on from Mancini to Pellegrini is too risky, but there's a very low likelihood that anyone who has a strong opinion on the matter has really followed a team Pellegrini has coached enough to get a sense for how he would fit in our setup, side, and situation.
If you had asked me about Mancini 4 years ago, you'd have gotten a very different opinion of him from me than you'd get today. And I don't mean a different opinion of him in terms of good/bad (things are not that binary), but in terms of the things he's good at, things I'm not enamored with, etc etc.
If you put a gun to my head, personally, i'd probably lean something like 55/45 toward the idea that Bobby probably isn't the answer. He's probably too one dimensional and unable to create a team that adapts to the different styles a (now)great team like City are going to face, finding a way to win in all those situations. But how the hell can anyone know if the Pellegrini of today can do that? Is the fear of that unknown worth just trying the same thing over again and hoping it is better this time? It's a hell of a decision and one that we're paying a lot of very smart and experienced football men to ponder over. I really don't see why this has to be so vitriolic and silly labels like "inner" and "outer" applied to everyone. In my opinion there's clearly a credible case to be made for sticking with Roberto and there's clearly a credible case to be made for moving on and trying to improve. All we can do as City fans is hope to hell the people in charge get it right.
Great post. This is where I'm at right now.
Trust in Txiki, he knows more about the differences between Mancini and Pellegrini than any of us.