Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
MihaiCity said:
Davs 19 said:
Pellegrini

Honours

[edit]Manager
Universidad Católica
Copa Interamericana: 1994
Copa Chile: 1995
LDU Quito
Serie A: 1999
San Lorenzo
Primera División: 2001 Clausura
Copa Mercosur: 2001
River Plate
Primera División: 2003 Clausura
Villarreal
UEFA Intertoto Cup: 2004
Individual
Miguel Muñoz Trophy for the Best Coach of the Year: 2008


Mancini

Managerial honours
Fiorentina
Coppa Italia (1): 2000–01
Lazio
Coppa Italia (1): 2003–04
Internazionale
Serie A (3): 2005–06, 2006–07, 2007–08
Coppa Italia (2): 2004–05, 2005–06
Supercoppa Italiana (2): 2005, 2006
Manchester City
Premier League (1): 2011–12
FA Cup (1): 2010–11
FA Community Shield (1): 2012
[edit]

I'm not sure why anyone could consider Pellegrini an upgrade on Mancini.



If you show us mancini trophy's vs pellegrini trophy's can you show us how much money spent mancini to get that and how much pellegrini?????? and btw pellegrini has a better record in Europa than mancini:)

There's a reason Pellagrini has never had a job where he could spend the big bucks. I'm sure that you can work it out.

Anyway, on the way into ours now....catch you later ...,.
 
The Man With The Stick said:
Davs 19 said:
There's a reason Pellagrini has never had a job where he could spend the big bucks. I'm sure that you can work it out.

Anyway, on the way into ours now....catch you later ...,.

Wasn't he responsible for one of Real Madrids biggest spends?

Ronaldo , Kaka and all ? Technically yes but most people see them as Perez signings......he was also forced to sell Schneider against his wishes.......

Just wanted to see what the poster I responded to came back with.

You should post more ;.)
 
LoveCity said:
"Whoever devotes 24 hours a day to football is a bad coach. Football is a combination of personality, taste, demands, leadership... Leadership is learned by reading, seeing and living. If football is all I know, then I know nothing."

"My philosophy is related to having good technical players. A player must be steadfast in one part of the pitch in order to close open spaces run relays, crosses, come out of his own side of the pitch... and you have to let him invent in the last 25 meters. I tell players, "Let's manage ten set-pieces. We won't be successful eight of the ten times, but we will win the match with the other two." Creative football is hard if you aren't able to combine with others or be comfortable touching the ball. If a coach gets upset the first time a player makes a mistake in the final meters, the player will do things practically, but not make a difference. Making mistakes while trying new things is better than plain football."


I love both of these quotes
 
Didsbury Dave said:
This is getting pretty funny, all you lot tying yourselves up in angry little knots...

Does anybody know this clown ?

Attention whore
 
Matty said:
Sky Blue said:
jknight said:
Are you winding us up - When was that? Start of last season? To be honest we haven't played sublime football in a long time - pedestrian, predictable and one dimensional but certaintly not sublime

Fuck me, have you been asleep these last few weeks. Chelsea, Red Shite at OT, The first goal at home to West Ham. We've played some really good stuff at times. To say "in a long time" is absolute bollocks.

That;s the thing with the way Mancini has got us playing, we are capable, at any given time, of playing some truly exceptional, attractive, football and putting any side to the sword. However, when it doesn't work, it looks slow, deliberate and toothless. Mancini's got his strengths and his faults, the fualts would seem to fall into a couple of areas, Man Management and stubbornness. He doesn't build natural relationships with his players, he's all stick and no carrot. Plus he thinks his way is the only way, and won't be aswayed by the evidence. We don't have a plan B as such, if the slow, methodical passing, and attaching centrally doesn't work then we don't really deviate too much from that. And he still insists on trying the 3-5-2 formation when each and every time we've gone to it we've looked unsettled and far from dangerous.

Personally I'm on the fence as to whether I want Mancini to go. I think if he stays I'll be happy, but I also wouldn't be crying if he left.

Thanks Matty, summed up my feelings perfectly.
 
I honestly just want to keep Mancini because I think he has done a good job in 3 1/2 seasons here. If he were to be replaced, I would only want it to be with a truly world class manager. For me Pellegrini is a bit of a risk. Would like to keep the stability but who knows, maybe Pellegrini will turn out to be success. Oh, and please, stop dividing ourselves into inners and outers, we both want what is best for MCFC (at least I hope so).
 
Andouble said:
LoveCity said:
"Whoever devotes 24 hours a day to football is a bad coach. Football is a combination of personality, taste, demands, leadership... Leadership is learned by reading, seeing and living. If football is all I know, then I know nothing."

"My philosophy is related to having good technical players. A player must be steadfast in one part of the pitch in order to close open spaces run relays, crosses, come out of his own side of the pitch... and you have to let him invent in the last 25 meters. I tell players, "Let's manage ten set-pieces. We won't be successful eight of the ten times, but we will win the match with the other two." Creative football is hard if you aren't able to combine with others or be comfortable touching the ball. If a coach gets upset the first time a player makes a mistake in the final meters, the player will do things practically, but not make a difference. Making mistakes while trying new things is better than plain football."


I love both of these quotes

Granada 1- 0 Malaga
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Danny Hoekman said:
I know it was only one game, but I went to the Malaga v Atletico Madrid game and I don't recall a single attempt on goal (by either side) in the whole 90 minutes!!!!
If you were a top class club looking for a new manager and you'd gone to the City v Wigan game recently you'd have signed Martinez rather than Mancini.
You're not the Messiah, you're a very naughty boy.
 
what i dont get is why now - would our owners really make such an approach and run the risk of this being made public so close to the cup final

Bollocks for me
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.