A
A
Anonymous
Guest
cleavers said:Fine be disappointed,I'm just giving my opinion, and I'm not arsed about getting into an argument with you. I've no idea (like you funnily enough) what happened at half time, but I'd hope they were too busy worrying about how to change what had gone on in the other 44 minutes of the first half.BillyShears said:cleavers said:Maybe in the heat of a very important match it wasn't passed back to him, in which case the video man has fucked up.
You make no bones about the fact you want rid of Mancini, so you will select anything to be negative about him, me, I'm not particularly with the fella right now either, but I'm not going to claim he's a liar to crucify him further.
You disappoint me Cleavers. Up until this morning I have done nothing but reiterate that I believe Mancini's deserves another season. I make no bones about the fact that tonight I think he needs to go - primarily because it looked like a lot of the players just didn't want to play for him today in what was such a big game.
As for me claiming he's a liar, once again I'll reiterate, and it's just my opinion, I believe it is inconceivable that nobody went to Mancini at half time told him about the challenge and also suggested Mario needs to come off.
The evidence suggests otherwise, as the second half followed the same pattern as the first, as well as Sunderland, Stoke, and Swansea. Balo today was a side show in many ways, he should have been off after 15 minutes, but he wasn't, and otherwise he contributed little or nothing, he got a red in the end for a nothing challenge that most refs would not have given a yellow, but I guess Atkinson had seen the first half assault, even if Mancini hadn't.
No problem. We'll leave it there.