Mancini (cont)

[Dethred]

Have I ever called Ian Cheeseman a rag? Or you a rag?

Don't make up things about people you know fuck all about and you'll probably get criticised much less.

FWIW I believe there is a lot of valid opinion in this thread and others from people that want Mancini out.

Sorry, I can't keep track of all the people in here that think criticism=rag. I prefer not to keep track, actually.

Funny, though that, the only response to my criticisms is bile and nothing of substance. When someone does post one of the usual, "he's won us _____ in ____ years", and I add context into the discussion, it then turns into "you hate Mancini", "You're a journalist" (YCNMIU, hilarious), etc.

Not to mention the people who cannot read plain English.

 

[samharris]

I am personally getting sick of the way this topic is dividing everyone and causing some of these insults.

Can we just agree that some of think there may need to be a change, and that if there is a better option, that it won't be a travesty to replace Mancini? We can all also agree that some of us want Mancini to be given several more years to grow as a manager and develop the club.

We all want the manager to succeed, we just have different opinions on where the future lies, but none of us can really do too much to affect it either way.

Let's respect the criticisms as valid OPINIONS, and stop this nonsense.

You started it.

 

[Dethred]

I was offering my opinion about the content of his post. Surely that's the whole point of the internet. I wasn't personal, I didn't call him pathetic and I didn't make derogatory comments about his memory.

I called the context of your post pathetic, as you did mine. And yes, you posted something and 30 seconds later contradicted yourself. Hopefully your memory will not be offended at only being able to last 30 seconds, and eventually forget about it.

"Criticise where criticism is due and you won't have a problem. Criticise where it's not and you will."

^^^ That was your response to a request to consider others' opinions. You fail, continually, to understand that just because you don't think its due, others will. You have a fundamental inability to understand what an opinion is. agree with us and "You won't have a problem"

Clearly a level-headed comment from you. Applause.

Everyone is welcome to an opinion, even Dethred. However if anyone shows a lack of balance, or an ignorance of facts or pushing a long running agenda they will be criticised for it. It happens to both sides of the argument, and I've seen plenty of posts from those that want Mancini out ridiculing the other side.

Oh deary me, I apparently now have an agenda. YCNMIU. Opinion=Agenda, too eh?

Personally thought your comments were so unreasonable and unbalanced that they didn't constitute opinion anyway. More a campaign message.

That's remarkable. I have an agenda, and a campaign message!!!

So I'm surprised it's taken someone 1734 pages to become aware of it or have a problem with it. I'm even more surprised that someone wants to go onto an internet message board to discuss an opinion, but then gets upset if anyone disagrees with it.

You don't disagree with it, smart guy, you denegrate others' opinions as something other than opinion. And you wonder why I've been less than kind in return. Its amazing.

 

[bernabias home shirt]

Unfuckinbelievable
Usual halfwits still digging their heals in over mancini
Get a fuckin grip another trophy is close to being delivered..

 

[Dethred]

Dethred: Can we please stop with all the pointless insults and have an actual discussion? *immediately makes ad hominem attacks*

I'll give you one thing. You've really got the "whining for civility whilst simultaneously making insults" part down very well. You could offer courses at a university.

Comical, as ever. I said, in admittedly too complex a manner, that he didn't put any thought into a reply, and now I'm the one insulting??

[Sarcasm]
Of course! Its me that is insulting for saying that his claims that I "have an agenda" or "campaign message" wasn't thoughtful or particularly differing from his usual empty comments. [/sarcasm]

 

[kaz7]

Unfuckinbelievable
Usual halfwits still digging their heals in over mancini
Get a fuckin grip another trophy is close to being delivered..

Not another trophy,im getting a bit fed up with those!

 

[samharris]

And the great thing about offering a subjective opinion is that there's a fair chance there will be someone that has a different opinion to you, and will tell you so.

Personally thought your comments were so unreasonable and unbalanced that they didn't constitute opinion anyway. More a campaign message.

Excellent post (for the first few words). The problem exists when you believe your opinion is valid to the exclusion of others' opinions. That would actually mean you think your OPINION is fact... which is comical.

Ironically, none of my OPINIONS were based on anything short of actual facts. That doesn't make my opinions themselves facts, but it means I actually am thinking, whereas you appear to not be devoid of anything remotely resembling thought. Or do you propose that people who criticize Mancini, such as Ian Cheeseman, are really rags or not city fans at all?

Pathetic as usual, from the usual suspects.

Dethred: Can we please stop with all the pointless insults and have an actual discussion? *immediately makes ad hominem attacks*

I'll give you one thing. You've really got the "whining for civility whilst simultaneously making insults" part down very well. You could offer courses at a university.

Would have to be Yale or Harvard..

 

[moomba]

I was offering my opinion about the content of his post. Surely that's the whole point of the internet. I wasn't personal, I didn't call him pathetic and I didn't make derogatory comments about his memory.

I called the context of your post pathetic, as you did mine. And yes, you posted something and 30 seconds later contradicted yourself. Hopefully your memory will not be offended at only being able to last 30 seconds, and eventually forget about it.

"Criticise where criticism is due and you won't have a problem. Criticise where it's not and you will."

^^^ That was your response to a request to consider others' opinions. You fail, continually, to understand that just because you don't think its due, others will. You have a fundamental inability to understand what an opinion is. agree with us and "You won't have a problem"

Clearly a level-headed comment from you. Applause.

Everyone is welcome to an opinion, even Dethred. However if anyone shows a lack of balance, or an ignorance of facts or pushing a long running agenda they will be criticised for it. It happens to both sides of the argument, and I've seen plenty of posts from those that want Mancini out ridiculing the other side.

Oh deary me, I apparently now have an agenda. YCNMIU. Opinion=Agenda, too eh?

Personally thought your comments were so unreasonable and unbalanced that they didn't constitute opinion anyway. More a campaign message.

That's remarkable. I have an agenda, and a campaign message!!!

So I'm surprised it's taken someone 1734 pages to become aware of it or have a problem with it. I'm even more surprised that someone wants to go onto an internet message board to discuss an opinion, but then gets upset if anyone disagrees with it.

You don't disagree with it, smart guy, you denegrate others' opinions as something other than opinion. And you wonder why I've been less than kind in return. Its amazing.

For someone who wants to take the debate to a higher plane you're certainly spending a lot of time discussing me, and not my thoughts on Mancini.

You've also been more personally insulting and ruder to me than I have been to you so I am starting to doubt your commitment to higher posting standards.

 

[Dethred]

So I'm surprised it's taken someone 1734 pages to become aware of it or have a problem with it. I'm even more surprised that someone wants to go onto an internet message board to discuss an opinion, but then gets upset if anyone disagrees with it.

Surely this is just trolling. I have no problem with a difference of OPINION. You've made it a point to state that those with contrary OPINIONS, aren't voicing opinions at all, but rather campaign messages, or an agenda.

Forget it, I don't expect you to even remotely understand what the fuck an opinion is.<br /><br />-- Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:52 am --<br /><br />

Unfuckinbelievable
Usual halfwits still digging their heals in over mancini
Get a fuckin grip another trophy is close to being delivered..

Service is resumed. What were you saying Moomba?

It happens to both sides of the argument, and I've seen plenty of posts from those that want Mancini out ridiculing the other side.

Ah yes, there it is.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

Unfuckinbelievable
Usual halfwits still digging their heals in over mancini
Get a fuckin grip another trophy is close to being delivered..

This exactly. How the fuck we are even discussing the possibility of binning a manager who wins (possibly) four trophies in four years is breathtaking.