I think if he kept winning, the executives and owner would have tolerated his eccentricities. Victory absolves many sins. I want to clarify that I don't believe the players were in open revolt. Perhaps one or two, but frankly that's not uncommon. His message wasn't getting through. He wasn't able to motivate the players to victory any longer. His shelf life had expired so to speak. Either you start over with new players or a new manager. I think we made the right choice.mancity111 said:taconinja said:If one were so inclined. Overall they would be right, too. You seem to mistake me for someone who thinks Mancini shouldn't have been sent packing. He lost the dressing room. You tend not to recover from that. The idea that he only deserves a "token of credit" (said early in the discussion) or that we don't have a remarkably better squad than we did when Mancini arrived (Ireland, Bellamy, Adebayor, etc. versus Negredo, Aguero, Navas, Silva, Toure, Nasri, etc.) is asinine.SWP's back said:Well I couldn't disagree any more stronger but I doubt either of us will convince the other to change their stance so we may as well agree to disagree.
-- Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:09 pm --
One may argue we had the best squad last season also??
I think it was more so the owners views on his public perception and his managerial style combined with the fact he is a three - five year manager at one club in anycase in the main and believes that 5 max is all you should hang around for no matter how much the supporters crave for you.
The spats with Balotelli and Tevez didn't help either irrespective of the distribution of blame.
As for the players perhaps some didn't like him much but as for the important and only word that matters and that is respect we shall see how many biographies can him on that score.