goalmole
Well-Known Member
Although we did have a good offensive capability under Mancini, the biggest difference this year is that the urgency to attack is evident from the first kick of the ball to the final whistle. Teams used to be all over us for the first twenty minutes of the game, and then we used to go into a defensive mode when we went in front, to try and defend the lead. This season we seem to be relentless in our attacks right up until the final whistle, thereby not giving teams any chance of regrouping in an attempt to get at us. This trait was evident in the away matches that we lost at the beginning of this season and, which seems largely to have been ironed out.ElanJo said:Challenger1978 said:ElanJo said:Mancini's title-winning team would beat the current team.
Better defensively but just as good going forward.
I'm a big fan of Mancini but i don't know about that. Negrado is one hell of a player and for the team does far more than either Balo or Tevez ever did.
Tevez? He's one of the best players I've seen in a blue shirt. Tho we were without him for much of the PL-winning season anyway.
We scored some brilliant team goals and at this point in the season (or at least a couple of weeks ago when I saw the stat) had scored just as many in the PL. I remember our play being praised at the time and even being compared to Barca, who themselves were in their pomp. Obviously we weren't as good as Barca then, neither is our current team. but the point is that I don't see a big difference in terms of attacking threat and 'positive/negative' football back then to now.
This change in attitude and mentality is one of the things that Pellegrini has brought to the club.