Let's imagine for a moment that we DO sack our most successful manager ever.
Will that make ferguson and utd worse?
Will that stop Chelsea spending to improve their squad?
Will that stop the possibility of Liverpool improving next year?
Or spurs?
Or arsenal?
If the answer to all the above Q's is "no" then lets say we end up with mourinho (please god, no)..
What if utd STILL push for the title (which they will), and god forbid, win it next year? What if (as is highly likely) we get another "group of death" next season in the CL?
We shouldn't be sticking with a manager because we want a 'dynasty' or 'consistency' if the said manager isn't good enough. Just how many basic tactical errors, or man management errors can a guy be allowed before the penny drops? The line 'I know the problem and I will
fix it' is becoming a regular post fuck up quote. Thinking outside the box here but how's about sort the problem before the horse has done one hey? If the club are serious about their intentions with mcfc and they will know Mancini isn't the man to take them where they want to be.
We could be sat here next year in a very similar position, having spent millions on sacking and recruiting managers to say nothing of any player purchases.
What do we do then. Sack the new manager?
Really?
This whole debate is an embarrassment. I don't believe there are another set of fans anywhere in the world as obtuse and frankly ungrateful as some on this forum.
If what happened to the scum last year on the last day had happened to us our fans would've burnt the ground down. Their fans rallied round their manager and team and are likely to be rewarded with another title.
Hate to say this but many on here could learn a thing or two about suppiort from our hated neighbours. It's a similar story with the way our fans treated ballotelli in contrast to the way the filth treated cantona.
Embarrassing.