Mancini to Juventus speculation

[cleavers]

can some one sum the 15 pages or so up as im not arsed reading threw it all and seems to be growing everyday,cheers

Speculation.



Summed up in one word. You might as well read The Sun.

 

[Lomas has a lob on]

I know its normal in the modern day game, but all these chief exec's type people fuck me off, there nearly more famous than the players, im not doubting they do a very good and important job, after all football is a business these days, I just hate "suits" running a football club. Niall Quinn, thats the guy i'd like at City doing the CEO job.

 

[cleavers]

Niall Quinn, thats the guy i'd like at City doing the CEO job.

Even if he's actually NO GOOD at doing the job ?

Good idea that.

 

[francis henry lee]

Niall Quinn, thats the guy i'd like at City doing the CEO job.

Even if he's actually NO GOOD at doing the job ?

Good idea that.

is marwood any better? at least quinn knows our club,supporters etc

 

[cleavers]

Marwood isn't CEO.

 

[Gelsons Dad]

Baseless speculation by halfwits.

beep beep beep beep beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

£100 kenyon is at city in the summer, take this halfwits money

you're on.

 

[francis henry lee]

Marwood isn't CEO.

but will be according to some

 

[Lucas North]

beep beep beep beep beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

£100 kenyon is at city in the summer, take this halfwits money

you're on.

Can l have some as well ?

City won't touch Kenyon with a barge-pole ,damaged, tarnished goods.

 

[francis henry lee]

you're on.

Can l have some as well ?

City won't touch Kenyon with a barge-pole ,damaged, tarnished goods.

i really hope you are right

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I'd be rather upset if we dumped Mancini for Mourinho. Not that I don't rate Mourinho, just that it would be hard to justify yet more change, in cold hard terms. the suspicion would be that we just went for the biggest name, the biggest reputation regardless of what's actually right for the club.

But suppose you're in this situation:
1) You've decided that MH isn't the man for the long term.
2) So you go out and speak to the best there is and tie JM down to a contract from next season.
3) MH gets wind of this and demands you back him or sack him so you do the latter.
4) You're in a mess now because you got a manager lined up but he won't leave his current club mid-season and you don't have a manager for the second half of the season.
5) You've got a mate that will step into the breach for 6 months (and he knows that's all it's likely to be).

That's what I believe happened. I also think that Mancini's behaviour means he's either not happy managing in the Premiership or that, after a bit of dithering, JM has finally agreed to take the job this summer.