Mancini v Pellegrini so far ......

Status
Not open for further replies.
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How do you draw that conclusion from that post?
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.
 
Skashion said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How do you draw that conclusion from that post?
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.

It's the fraternizing with the cabal that did for him.
 
Skashion said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How do you draw that conclusion from that post?
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.
Perhaps he is rather pragmatic about it all which is the stance I take
 
Rammy Blue said:
It's the fraternizing with the cabal that did for him.
The Cabal is mostly a well-to-do middle-class organisation, it's only natural that he was drawn towards them. His lip service to working-class acquaintances cannot be expected to compete with that.
 
Ducado said:
Skashion said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How do you draw that conclusion from that post?
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.
Perhaps he is rather pragmatic about it all which is the stance I take
It's the only sensible stance to take.
 
Skashion said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
How do you draw that conclusion from that post?
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.
Well firstly, that post was merely pointing out the absurdity of stating in one sentence that we might have to be patient, followed up by a second sentence saying he hoped we wouldn't have to wait too long! My feelings on Mancini, Pellegrini or any other living person had no bearing on its comedy value to me, which is why I asked the question, as I felt it was a curious time to raise such a matter.

I suppose, if I'm honest, like any fence sitter you sometimes have to move position or you get a splinter in your arse. I am a pragmatist and I suppose that tends to make you a little more hard-nosed which could be construed by some as less loyal. As I have said on numerous occasions he was the right man at the right time, I will forever be grateful for some incredible memories and for tearing down that banner, but it was the correct decision to sack him for reasons that were extraneous to matters on the pitch. I am directing my support towards the incumbent and giving him the same levels of support I did Mancini when people on here were unfairly critical of him, especially in the time leading up to the FA Cup win.

So in response to you half-buttered "J'accuse", I would say that may be fair comment about my perspective on Roberto towards the end of his regime. If that makes me a bit of a quisling then I'm sorry, but there you go. We don't live in a world of absolutes or black and white and that will colour my posting output as much as it does my views on the world more generally.
 
andyhinch said:
Ducado said:
Skashion said:
Don't be daft, of course it's not a judgement formed by one post, more many over half a year. You've been quite defensive about Pellegrini and the decision to sack Mancini, in a way I cannot recall in the opposite direction in defence of Mancini or the prospect of keeping him. Your bread may not have been totally buttered on one side but I think it might have been half-buttered against Mancini.
Perhaps he is rather pragmatic about it all which is the stance I take
It's the only sensible stance to take.
I agree far to often people allow themselves to be painted into a corner and then find themselves stuck
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Well firstly, that post was merely pointing out the absurdity of stating in one sentence that we might have to be patient, followed up by a second sentence saying he hoped we wouldn't have to wait too long! My feelings on Mancini, Pellegrini or any other living person had no bearing on its comedy value to me, which is why I asked the question, as I felt it was a curious time to raise such a matter.

I suppose, if I'm honest, like any fence sitter you sometimes have to move position or you get a splinter in your arse. I am a pragmatist and I suppose that tends to make you a little more hard-nosed which could be construed by some as less loyal. As I have said on numerous occasions he was the right man at the right time, I will forever be grateful for some incredible memories and for tearing down that banner, but it was the correct decision to sack him for reasons that were extraneous to matters on the pitch. I am directing my support towards the incumbent and giving him the same levels of support I did Mancini when people on here were unfairly critical of him, especially in the time leading up to the FA Cup win.

So in response to you half-buttered "J'accuse", I would say that may be fair comment about my perspective on Roberto towards the end of his regime. If that makes me a bit of a quisling then I'm sorry, but there you go. We don't live in a world of absolutes or black and white and that will colour my posting output as much as it does my views on the world more generally.
Wasn't expecting that. A little playful observation and GDM comes out all guns blazing. Not sure if that's all that pragmatic. Yes, I am still being playful - as I am 90% of the time, which you should know better than anyone. However, I know you're being rather sensitive right now after being accused of just being an internet personality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.