SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
mackenzie said:I don't know either way, but an educated guess ( and that is all any of us can do) is that he wasn't happy and tried to.SWP's back said:So you don't believe Mancini has tried to get on top of this behind closed doors before?mackenzie said:I understand that assumption.
But how do you know what went on before, behind closed doors?
All I'm saying is that we need to get a 'siege mentality' at City. We need to stop playing right into the hands of the media and Mancini needs to curb that volatility and wise up.
If any Manager of ours has to resort to publicly going controlled apeshit in front of a camera just to get rid of a primadonna twat then that isn't good.
Is that what you are inferring happened here?
They asked him why he didn't put Tevez on for goodness sake (see I'm not swearing as you don't like it).
What was he meant to say? He'd have been slated for not bringing a striker on if he had "kept it in house" and he was rightfully furious.
I think the 2nd guessing that's going on in the cold light of day 48 hours later is, quite frankly, destructive and holier than though.
Fergie gave Beckham 3 stiches after kicking a boot into his face. Would you have preferred that? Mancini would have been sacked yesterday if that was the case.