Mancini's future

Dezko has apologised to Mancini.

Would you look at that, makes your heart smile doesn't it.
 
mcmanus said:
de niro said:
look, however his methods (good and bad at times) mancini has really got us going, we are a fucking good team, playing well and winning things, its what we have all dreamed about for decades, all fans,all players and more important all board members have to back him on this.

back him now and no player will ever fuck with our club again.


Ain't a mod arse licker at all this is the first time ;) bang on

But cheers De Niro please sing Mancini's name loud and proud at Ewood

oh i will i promise, i can't wait, bob will know how we feel i assure you.
 
Balti said:
SWP's back said:
bluemanc said:
Not sure who you're asking but he put Nige on so as not to concede a 3rd that's why he didn't put a striker on,he said that.
btw off topic a bit but fergie actually threw the boot in beckhams face,he didn't kick it.

<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/2778353.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 778353.stm</a>

wrong again mate ;-)

As for answering the question, Mancini wanted to put Tevez on as the 2nd sub. De Jong coming on was entirely different, Mancini said he did that to calm the game down.

those of us that watch City know that Mancini quite often 'staggers' his subs and doesn't always do a straight one off like for like

He was in the process of changing things around and Tevez was next

Well he would have been if he was a professional prepared to do his job for more money in a week than most people earn in a decade

ungrateful petulant greedy bitter little fecker who didn't get his way and is now fucking us about big style

seriously when was the last great Tevez performance for City?

yes he's been professional but his heart has not been in it

If he wants to leave so much then he can simply pay up his contract and some compo and fuck off

After all he can afford it

But no this is all about yet another big pay day for him and his pet leech

This is nothing to do with RM and everything to do with CT (and his agent)
But vultures prey on the (preceived) weak.

Hence the first chance they have this season, the clubs resident half dozen Mancini detrators come out in (lol) "force".

They will go back into their respective caves after a decent win at the weekend, but god forbid, we don't win away, expect to see further calls for his head.
 
SWP's back said:
Balti said:
remoh said:
If people looked a little deeper, perhaps they'd be chanting for our owner, rather than Roberto.
What League position do you think we 'd have had in more normal financial circumstances under Mancini? and how far ahead of the Rags might we have been with a manager who could have handled, and seen the value of, Bellamy, Adebayor, Ireland, Tevez and Petrov and Given, who have all been sold cheaply or sent on loan?
Loyalty is essential, but it should be to the Club, not our present, blundering manager

Is that Bellers the Liverpool reserve? Ade the lazy mardarse who stopped trying at City? Ireland the Villa reserve? Petrov the Bolton player and Given the Villa keeper? Hardly ripping up trees are they?

And if Roberto Mancini blunders his way to more silverware and Champions League football then that's the sort of blundering we like.

But of course yes Thank You Sheikh Mansour once again for investing in our club and attracting a better calibre of player for our best manager in a generation.

Our loyalty is to the club. Unlike you we are clearly happy with the progress that the club and the team under Mancini are making.

*inserts clapping gif*

Bellamy, reserve? Last week, made one scored one. Not bad for a reserve, eh?
Adebayor, 'lazy mardarse' who would now be playing for Real if they could have afforded him and is now a regular starter for Spurs (and a regular scorer)
Ireland is just now getting starts after a long period of injuries, but we at City all know how good he can be, don't we?
Petrov is still good enough to get a regular place in the Prem. and although getting older and losing pace, would have been a real asset in the squad.

Given is still a top keeper. A better manager may have held on to him.

With the players that we now have, what kind of manager could fail?, but it could all have gone much better and more quickly with a manager who had experience of premiership management.
 
SWP's back said:
Balti said:
SWP's back said:
<a class="postlink" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/m/man_utd/2778353.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 778353.stm</a>

wrong again mate ;-)

As for answering the question, Mancini wanted to put Tevez on as the 2nd sub. De Jong coming on was entirely different, Mancini said he did that to calm the game down.

those of us that watch City know that Mancini quite often 'staggers' his subs and doesn't always do a straight one off like for like

He was in the process of changing things around and Tevez was next

Well he would have been if he was a professional prepared to do his job for more money in a week than most people earn in a decade

ungrateful petulant greedy bitter little fecker who didn't get his way and is now fucking us about big style

seriously when was the last great Tevez performance for City?

yes he's been professional but his heart has not been in it

If he wants to leave so much then he can simply pay up his contract and some compo and fuck off

After all he can afford it

But no this is all about yet another big pay day for him and his pet leech

This is nothing to do with RM and everything to do with CT (and his agent)
But vultures prey on the (preceived) weak.

Hence the first chance they have this season, the clubs resident half dozen Mancini detrators come out in (lol) "force".

They will go back into their respective caves after a decent win at the weekend, but god forbid, we don't win away, expect to see further calls for his head.

Who has called for his head?
 
remoh said:
SWP's back said:
Balti said:
Is that Bellers the Liverpool reserve? Ade the lazy mardarse who stopped trying at City? Ireland the Villa reserve? Petrov the Bolton player and Given the Villa keeper? Hardly ripping up trees are they?

And if Roberto Mancini blunders his way to more silverware and Champions League football then that's the sort of blundering we like.

But of course yes Thank You Sheikh Mansour once again for investing in our club and attracting a better calibre of player for our best manager in a generation.

Our loyalty is to the club. Unlike you we are clearly happy with the progress that the club and the team under Mancini are making.

*inserts clapping gif*

Bellamy, reserve? Last week, made one scored one. Not bad for a reserve, eh?
Adebayor, 'lazy mardarse' who would now be playing for Real if they could have afforded him and is now a regular starter for Spurs (and a regular scorer)
Ireland is just now getting starts after a long period of injuries, but we at City all know how good he can be, don't we?
Petrov is still good enough to get a regular place in the Prem. and although getting older and losing pace, would have been a real asset in the squad.

Given is still a top keeper. A better manager may have held on to him.

With the players that we now have, what kind of manager could fail?, but it could all have gone much better and more quickly with a manager who had experience of premiership management.


Hughes had pemiership experience and he failed.
 
SWP's back said:
mackenzie said:
SWP's back said:
Nothing you say here is mutually exclusive to what I have posted Macker.


I've been simply asking how Mancini could keep it all "in house" which such a public showing of disrepect from Tevez on the world stage.

And you jumped on my post because you found it 'ambiguous?'

I can understand that. All I was trying to say though is that Mancini could have been better served by not allowing his emotions to come to the fore in the press conference.

Tevez is the twat here but Mancini needs to learn the art of damage limitation. Then he will be a force to be reckoned with and players won't try and take the piss in such a public fashion.

Oh I think he made his point.

And I "jumped" over nothing Mack. I simply quoted and questioned you, as is the done thing on here.
Of course you reacted. You thought you saw a poster who had an agenda against Mancini and that influenced the rest of your posts. Balance has never been the greatest thing about BM over the years it has to be said, but some of us do try.
;-)
You going Blackburn? If so I'll buy you a pint if I see you ;-)
 
SWP's back said:
Dezko has apologised to Mancini.

Would you look at that, makes your heart smile doesn't it.

Yes. Good lad is Dzecko. All that on Tuesday was mere frustration and that is good to see.
 
bluefandk said:
remoh said:
SWP's back said:
*inserts clapping gif*

Bellamy, reserve? Last week, made one scored one. Not bad for a reserve, eh?
Adebayor, 'lazy mardarse' who would now be playing for Real if they could have afforded him and is now a regular starter for Spurs (and a regular scorer)
Ireland is just now getting starts after a long period of injuries, but we at City all know how good he can be, don't we?
Petrov is still good enough to get a regular place in the Prem. and although getting older and losing pace, would have been a real asset in the squad.

Given is still a top keeper. A better manager may have held on to him.

With the players that we now have, what kind of manager could fail?, but it could all have gone much better and more quickly with a manager who had experience of premiership management.


Hughes had pemiership experience and he failed.


Hughes had a crap defence coach and a third of the quality playing staff that we have now.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.