Marc Cucurella

Status
Not open for further replies.
frustrating because this is good signing for Chelsea going to make them even better defensively. I literally give two shits about the fee. Does he improve them? Yes he does. I don’t understand this thing about fees, surely if the player improves your team you pay it.
Well they've been turned down more times than the beds at Holiday Inn.

Cucurella's first choice was us. He only went there because we weren't prepared to pay the crazy fees Brighton wanted.
 
Manchester City had a price they wanted to pay and was confident they would eventually sign the player. The club obviously didn’t predict that Chelsea would come in desperate and willing. Abit like Manchester United with Alexis.

From then on the whole balance changed and rightly so.

Manchester City have got this right. They go again. Bring on Sunday!
 
Chelsea fans are happy they've got the player but seem miffed about the fee, Brighton fans seem happy with the fee but pissed off that they're now effectively developing a young Chelsea centre back with no option to buy instead of just reinvesting the Cucurella fee and we're sat here without a left back.

Weird one.
Actually we’re sat here minus a more than competent left back we sold to Arsenal for a bargain price.
 
Chelsea fans are happy they've got the player but seem miffed about the fee, Brighton fans seem happy with the fee but pissed off that they're now effectively developing a young Chelsea centre back with no option to buy instead of just reinvesting the Cucurella fee and we're sat here without a left back.

Weird one.
It's a bit of a weird window all round. The Mbappe PSG stuff, Barcelona's position, the uncertainty around future earnings. This is another one really. Odd. Must be a nightmare to be City, trying to give the impression you're sensible and stable, buying well early, and then seeing this happen.
 
Manchester City had a price they wanted to pay and was confident they would eventually sign the player. The club obviously didn’t predict that Chelsea would come in desperate and willing. Abit like Manchester United with Alexis.

From then on the whole balance changed and rightly so.

Manchester City have got this right. They go again. Bring on Sunday!
Any news on the next target?
 
A player perceived as a big talent doesn't go to Brighton at 23 y.o. for 15m. Who was after him last summer, given he was available at 15m and perceived as a top talent? No top team, right? That's the answer for you. Not every youngster at Barca's academy is (perceived as) a big talent.

Teams like City are amongst the best in the world precisely because they don't sign unproven players for the 1st team. Better to wait and sign a player for 50m than to fill the squad with unproven talents.

When we sign Sergio Gomez for 15m, he wil be percieved as a big talent.

But then, he will be moving to the PL champions rather than a mid table team, and is 21 rather than 23.
 
frustrating because this is good signing for Chelsea going to make them even better defensively. I literally give two shits about the fee. Does he improve them? Yes he does. I don’t understand this thing about fees, surely if the player improves your team you pay it.
Also would you buy an house 20 grand over the asking price because its got a nice Garden?

There has to be a limit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.