If that's the case would you be happy Haaland going to R Madrid for 100m in 12 months, no need for City to be greedy is thereAnything north of £40m is not the right approach. They took him of getafe for a relatively low fee and will double their money. No need to be greedy.
No point keeping an unhappy player. We make a tidy profit and move on.If that's the case would you be happy Haaland going to R Madrid for 100m in 12 months, no need for City to be greedy is there
Is Cucurella unhappyNo point keeping an unhappy player. We make a tidy profit and move on.
Destroyed......really??pre season on 27 June, these players really are being destroyed.
I think the price would get higher if us, or the Dippers, or Chelsea, or the Tags etc, etc were in for him. Brighton have no reason to sell.yes his price seems to gradually get higher since we were first linked with him.
best still would imo a 35m price and 1 youngster on loan to them they can use for squad depth which they had problems with last season.
Not as Nurses etc are, but they are in terms of them never being able to reach their full potential because they burn out.Destroyed......really??
Ok, I'll take that.Not as Nurses etc are, but they are in terms of them never being able to reach their full potential because they burn out.
There's loads of other options. Cucurella is a good player but he's not going to revolutionise the way we play. Which is why I don't really expect this to happen - when we were first linked I assumed there would be a release clause, only way I could see it getting done.£35mill is way off. I would laugh at City for that opening offer. I'm sure Brighton would as well. Player of the season. 4 year contract. Young. Etc. Go in between £40mill-£45mill and work upwards gradually. Brighton might take us seriously then. Sometimes City have to pay the asking and going price. This is one of those occasions. There is no other option.
He should be if he can’t get a move to city.Is Cucurella unhappy