Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
laserblue said:
Or he's confusing Pellegrini with the Turtle because that's exactly what that shiny headed clown does.
Click to expand...

Or he should keep it shut.

3 games in charge of Southend Utd, winning 1 and losing the other 2 does not qualify him to make that sort of remark about a manager who won a league and cup double in his first season.

Stupid Twat!

Stewart Robson that is ;-)
 
Nails said:
Awful, awful clickbait bollox and shite.
Click to expand...

Q) What's it got to do with a London newspaper?

A) there's loads of rags down there to pander to.

That's what all this coverage boils down to. Media outlets are well aware which clubs have most fans and stories about those clubs will get more clicks (selling paper copies is increasingly irrelevant). Whatever we think about it fact is we haven't got the millions of global followers that Liverpool, Arsenal and United have. It's simple economics. I doubt the writers even believe half of what they write but they a know who pays the bills. It's not personal.
 
IanBishopsHaircut said:
The only reason the media are like they are is because most of the journos don't support City...They mainly support the traditional top 4

This is unavoidable and we will just have to suck it up until the new generation come through the ranks...Chances are there may be a better representation of City journos the more years we are there or thereabouts at the top of the tree
Click to expand...


This and as utd's casual fans stop clicking to mutv as their decline from top dog becomes more apparent; the analysts will be telling their boss the trend of gerneral possitive utd/liverpool news and negative City stuff is not the dynamic anymore and it is not paying to keep that narrative.

Just for now though the seething masses are happy to shake their fist at us because their team is not doing so great, unless they are just bitter Chelsea fans.
 
Daily Mail went through "hits and misses" of City signings.

Apparently Zack Faour is a failed signing for us, having been signed at 15 and two years later failed to make a single first team appearance.
 
Damocles said:
Daily Mail went through "hits and misses" of City signings.

Apparently Zack Faour is a failed signing for us, having been signed at 15 and two years later failed to make a single first team appearance.
Click to expand...
Maybe the Mail is actually a satire paper and no ones picked up on it yet? That's all I can think off because at this point they have become a parody of themselves.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.