DiscoSteve
Well-Known Member
the sooner you realise that 'news' companies create/need stories to sell bog paper or advertising rather than report whats actually happening the better
the sooner you realise that 'news' companies create/need stories to sell bog paper or advertising rather than report whats actually happening the better
the sooner you realise that 'news' companies create/need stories to sell bog paper or advertising rather than report whats actually happening the better
The BBC are happy to headline the DJIAC storyI agree with this. My issue is with a broadcasting company that has gone out of its way to mock City and its fans.
As low as SkySports, BBC, The Mail and Talksport go even they wouldn't stoop to this.
A true Blue saying it how it is and how right he was..
" you mad bro" ?? no he's fucking spot on.
I'm not sure if there are many who don't realise why the media do what they do. It doesn't make it better though. My club is still getting the shitty end of the stick whatever the reasons are. It actually makes it worse not better that there is a concerted effort to run us down whilst bigging others up just to appease the masses.the sooner you realise that 'news' companies create/need stories to sell bog paper or advertising rather than report whats actually happening the better
I seem to remember the papers giving totally different stats ( which backed up Buzzers comments) the next game at the swamp was the 1-6.. buzzer you beauty.I'm sure I've seen somewhere that either those or some other stats sky showed during that rant were made up to try and make Buzzer look an idiot?
That's what you get when you don't follow the narrativeI'm sure I've seen somewhere that either those or some other stats sky showed during that rant were made up to try and make Buzzer look an idiot?