Media bias against City

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ric said:
Just seen this belter from The Star:

CRltWmJWUAANz5v.jpg
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/ansbroray

is that the fella ?
 
I know Ray Ansbro(he is a rag), he drinks in my pub from time to time. I know his brother very well and while he also a rag, a nicer guy you couldn't meet. However, that 'article' is appalling and given it's in a national publication it just shows how easy it is to be racist toward anyone from that region and get away with it. I'll give the **** who wrote it both barrels next time I see him.
 
He's on Twitter let him know how you feel

@ansbroray

Going off his timeline he's defo a bitter rag. Retweets pro united stuff and had digs at our empty seats
 
What's wrong with our costs and debt being written off by an owner?

They play up hell when owners take out substantial loans against clubs, spend money they don't have and bleed the finances dry from every revenue possible. So United and Liverpool pay their way? How? They don't solely spend their profit revenue on transfer fees and wages do they? Or is it because when they regenerate their stadiums, they're repaid to the owners over 15 years?

Football is a better place with Sheik's and Ambramovic's, fuck the status quo and fuck their revisionist histories and principles
 
Fallingbostel Blue said:
http://www.skysports.com/watch/vide...7/manchester-city-v-bournemouth-8211-nicholas


This prick gets worse each week, all poor goals and 3 tap ins for Sterling.
Click to expand...
Just watched that and didn't see any problem with it. He said two of Sterling's goals were tap ins, not three, which is true. He didn't say they were all poor goals. The only part which could be construed as negative against City is that he said "a lot of mistakes rather than brilliant football", which I would agree with as well anyway.
 
Talulah said:
Just watched that and didn't see any problem with it. He said two of Sterling's goals were tap ins, not three, which is true. He didn't say they were all poor goals. The only part which could be construed as negative against City is that he said "a lot of mistakes rather than brilliant football", which I would agree with as well anyway.
Click to expand...

His third goal wasn't a tap in. He had to shimmer past his man to create the space to shoot.
 
Ric said:
Just seen this belter from The Star:

CRltWmJWUAANz5v.jpg
Click to expand...
Absolutely vile. Ban this tosser from the ground. Disgusting this is what the content is in the media these days. The sooner they all fuck off and become irrelevant the better
 
PSmyth07 said:
Despite them 5 goals, Sergio has been poor this season. Vardy has 9 goals in a poorer Leicester team.
Click to expand...

World class, end of and always will be yet the British press think Vardy is more worthy.

Sums it up lol.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top