Media Discussion - 2023/24

[Manc in London]

@mickthehack

Ah. Been following him for ages. For the City stuff rather than what's going on across the Irish Sea. Have noticed his digs about football journalism.

 

[mattcity5]

Anybody seen the BBC article "The best Premier League dynasties, who was the greatest?"

You have to rank Pep's City, 2 Ferguson sides, Mourinho's Chelsea and Wenger's Arsenal.

I obviously put the correct team top, us, but after I submitted united jumped to the top with us second. Anybody else notice this?

 

[Toney’s bookie]

Anybody seen the BBC article "The best Premier League dynasties, who was the greatest?"

You have to rank Pep's City, 2 Ferguson sides, Mourinho's Chelsea and Wenger's Arsenal.

I obviously put the correct team top, us, but after I submitted united jumped to the top with us second. Anybody else notice this?

Yes!!!!! Exactly the same

 

[lust overlord]

Yes!!!!! Exactly the same

Yes.
Weird.
Or maybe not.

 

[77lost by a point]

treble

when you start considering the charity shield as a major trophy, you are on a slipery slope of desperation.
it has similar value to the joan gamper and shamrock cup, novelty friendly and nowt more

You do realise that you have inadvertently done to them what they want to do to us. This means the rags trophy haul is down by 21, Arse by 17 and the dippers by 16.

 

[Centurions]

Anybody seen the BBC article "The best Premier League dynasties, who was the greatest?"

You have to rank Pep's City, 2 Ferguson sides, Mourinho's Chelsea and Wenger's Arsenal.

I obviously put the correct team top, us, but after I submitted united jumped to the top with us second. Anybody else notice this?

I presume it's showing you the voting so far after you submitted your choice. Not that I'll bother. I did vote on one the other day on which players them lot should get rid of or keep. I sold the entire team but on second thoughts perhaps I should have kept them all?

 

[mattcity5]

I presume it's showing you the voting so far after you submitted your choice. Not that'll bother. I did vote on one the other day on which players them lot should get rid of or keep. I sold the entire team but on second thoughts perhaps I should have kept them all?

Yeah possibly, but it's not doing it on purpose. It's like for less than a second and without percentages, just the positions change.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Anybody seen the BBC article "The best Premier League dynasties, who was the greatest?"

You have to rank Pep's City, 2 Ferguson sides, Mourinho's Chelsea and Wenger's Arsenal.

I obviously put the correct team top, us, but after I submitted united jumped to the top with us second. Anybody else notice this?

Same here, lol.

 

[artfuldodger]

Seems to be proof positive that he reads BM :)

If anyone wants to read the smirking prats "views" you can do so at https://archive.ph/Vai0W which saves the Telegraph getting any money.

I cannot believe that article. I thought for a minute it was a piss take. He really hates us.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Dan Roan interviews Phil Foden and doesn't mention 115. Wonders will never cease lol. Regardless I dont think City should have given the turd access to Foden.