cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,623
If this ever comes into football the games against the top teams tickets be going for well over £100 blame Uber they started it
Touts have been doing it for years ;)
If this ever comes into football the games against the top teams tickets be going for well over £100 blame Uber they started it
They’ve got serious form at being seriously wank.
Prick parry is an absolute snake and he will fall on his sword one day...an absolute weaponHe's Bessy mates with Prick Parry and Daniel Levy. Both of those cunts is probably feeding him to prepare another shit storm should we be cleared.
Like a Benny Hill closing sequence hopefully!There are loopholes all round for City to exploit in our case. Hopefully Lord Panick will lead them a merry dance
It is like the old "It is not what Parliament intended".Cunts, so they write a rule down, Leicester abide by it but, then they say 'oh we didn’t mean it like that' not surprised it was kicked out. Can you imagine if everyone treated contracts like that.
He won’t fall.....but he may be pushed !!Prick parry is an absolute snake and he will fall on his sword one day...an absolute weapon
It's life imitiating art, and in this case, art is the Monty Python Oscar Wilde sketch. "Erm, what I meant was..."It’s actually unbelievable.
The dirty old piss stained shit bag is still a director of the ‘football’ club......and has shared responsibility for the state of the vermin in addition to being 100% responsible for the catastrophic dispute with the Coolmore MafiaYes, it's amazing that the GPC still hasn't had any media backlash over his latter days with the Trafford Tramps.
The "Rock of Gibraltar" saga resulted in the Glazers owning Fergie's club. Yet, it is seldom mentioned. In fact, the GPC has never publicly rebuked the Glazers ?
Even though Scruffy Jim now runs the football side, the GPC is still a paid employee.
Wonder where he parks his car ?
It is like the old "It is not what Parliament intended".
You act like we are in court here?!You’re doing it again. I haven’t said it will apply to all cases; I’ve said that their gross incompetence in relation to one set of charges could provide an indicator in relation to ours. I suggest you look up the word ‘could’ if you are struggling to understand what I am saying.
You definitively state that the undeniable fact an organisation misapplied and misconceived its own rules has no bearing whatsoever on the possibility that the charges against us, within the same set of rules, from the same organisation could be, misconceived.
It is an utterly bizarre thing to suggest.
If the case against Leicester was fundamentally flawed how can you dismiss the possibility that the one against us is too?