manimanc
Well-Known Member
Transfer Centre LIVE! Football transfer news, updates and rumours
Follow the latest news, gossip, rumours and reaction with the Sky Sports Transfer Centre...
Standard.
Again, and possibly with greater clarity, I don’t think one case has any corollary to the other, or that gross incompetence can be assigned to all PL cases.It would be foolish, I agree, but that’s not the point I made, which was in response to what you posted, which was as follows:
The word ANY [sic] being unilaterally emphasised by you. My point was that the gross incompetence of the PL could have a bearing on the implication or corollary to City’s situation, which it plainly could. It would be absurd to suggest otherwise.
You've then moved the narrative to the above post, which such is a huge departure from what you previously said, to render it to be descending into the realms of non-sequiturs.
![]()
Transfer Centre LIVE! Football transfer news, updates and rumours
Follow the latest news, gossip, rumours and reaction with the Sky Sports Transfer Centre...www.skysports.com
Standard.
A rag I work with hates Haaland this season.It fucking hurts them like hell
How is Fergie these days?A rag I work with hates Haaland this season.
I said it was Grealish last season you used to tell me you hated, but never mentioned Haaland, what has changed?
He retorted, I just hate everything about City and he walked off mumbling to himself like a sad little drunk.
3 games in and Erling has destroyed them already
You’re doing it again. I haven’t said it will apply to all cases; I’ve said that their gross incompetence in relation to one set of charges could provide an indicator in relation to ours. I suggest you look up the word ‘could’ if you are struggling to understand what I am saying.Again, and possibly with greater clarity, I don’t think one case has any corollary to the other, or that gross incompetence can be assigned to all PL cases.
One might think of the PL as buffoons, who are the Keystone Kops of charges against teams, but, while one case may be flawed due to a “technicality” (not being in the PL and thus not under PL jurisdiction), it has no bearing on the other.
In reality, probably laughing his head off that the rags still pay him an extraordinary amount of money for doing nothing. He probably laughs at mugs in private.How is Fergie these days?
In reality, probably laughing his head off that the rags still pay him an extraordinary amount of money for doing nothing. He probably laughs at mugs in private.
It certainly would have been one of the bigger savingsI thought he would have been one of the 250 made redundant
Yes, it's amazing that the GPC still hasn't had any media backlash over his latter days with the Trafford Tramps.In reality, probably laughing his head off that the rags still pay him an extraordinary amount of money for doing nothing. He probably laughs at mugs in private.
You’re doing it again. I haven’t said it will apply to all cases; I’ve said that their gross incompetence in relation to one set of charges could provide an indicator in relation to ours. I suggest you look up the word ‘could’ if you are struggling to understand what I am saying.
You definitively state that the undeniable fact an organisation misapplied and misconceived its own rules has no bearing whatsoever on the possibility that the charges against us, within the same set of rules, from the same organisation could be, misconceived.
It is an utterly bizarre thing to suggest.
If the case against Leicester was fundamentally flawed how can you dismiss the possibility that the one against us is too?
Yes, it's amazing that the GPC still hasn't had any media backlash over his latter days with the Trafford Tramps.
The "Rock of Gibraltar" saga resulted in the Glazers owning Fergie's club. Yet, it is seldom mentioned. In fact, the GPC has never publicly rebuked the Glazers ?
Even though Scruffy Jim now runs the football side, the GPC is still a paid employee.
Wonder where he parks his car ?
Meant to post that too, but forgot!Added to the fact they got the charges wrong when they were released to the media.
That’s because they know where the bodies are buried.In fact, the GPC has never publicly rebuked the Glazers ?
Yahoo news page this morning. One of the leading stories is about 'dynamic ticket pricing' being introduced to football. Guess who the pic is of on the front page? Yup, us (and Chelsea)
Then in the actual article, they manage to squeeze our name in, even though it's about Valencia planning to do such.
Cnuts.
''La Liga club Valencia is set to introduce 'dynamic pricing' for tickets after Oasis courted controversy for a similar action last week.
Fans of the Manchester City supporting band were outraged last week after they spent hours in queues for tickets that were at least double the price advertised when eventually allowed onto the website. Ticketmaster explained this process as 'dynamic pricing' which occurs when an event is particularly popular.''
He's Bessy mates with Prick Parry and Daniel Levy. Both of those cunts are probably feeding him to prepare another shit storm should we be cleared.Simon Jordan having a cry all day about Leicester. Sailing quite close to the wind I think by constantly saying they are guilty but got off on a technicality. They are guilty of nothing, and 'got off' ' because the PL are shit and their rules are as badly drafted as the charges against city.
Meant to post that too, but forgot!
They’ve got serious form at being seriously wank.It’s a long list of fuckwittery