bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
To be fair I think McNulty is ok with his coverage of City. An old school professional,Setting them up for a big fall maybe?
To be fair I think McNulty is ok with his coverage of City. An old school professional,Setting them up for a big fall maybe?
I’m not sure if you have read the article but it’s isn’t negative about signing Donnarumma either.Find me one negative article about a rag or dipper signing and I'll concede you have a point.
;-)It's interesting to see which club gets their player shown. Now, do you look at it as a nice bit of advertising for the club, or do you look at it as an insinuation to the braindead that City are spending, spending, spending?
Or Trent![]()
Trent Alexander-Arnold: Are Real Madrid kings of the free transfer?
When it comes to acquiring world-class free transfers, Real Madrid are in a league of their own.www.bbc.co.uk
Top headline on the football page. FFS.
Dear BBC,
No one gives a fuck about Real Madrid
Even the BBC don't fucking know what Slimy Stone job role is.
In the last week depending on the article he's wrote he's either:
Manchester United reporter
Sports reporter
Chief football reporter
Absolute shambles
the fact that they dont get a whack is why things are in the state they are, we have to be thoughtful and listen to everyones opinions and give them equal validity when the reality is that their opinions arent worth a damn they just come from people who shout the loudest and whos gross stupidity makes equally stupid people feel better about themselves.Just watched a clip of the overlap where the City fan on there defends Pep after that Chelsea muppet and the brummy red sit there laughing stating he's overrated and should be sacked after ONE bad season. no idea how the City lad on there sits and argues with them and controls his temper, i'd be fucking banned after whacking the pair of the twats
A slight? How so?No offence JRB but if the same headline had been about us, after a summer of spending, many would have viewed it as a slight.
Don't have to apologise for pointing out his hypocrisy. If that headline was City this thread would be in meltdownNo offence JRB but if the same headline had been about us, after a summer of spending, many would have viewed it as a slight.
Everytime I here about a dipper trying to leave Anfield im reminded of the film AlcatrazI wonder how the media are going to spin it when Isak wants out from the cult?
They won't be able to give him shit for going on strike, as any self-respecting pundit (I know) will tell Liverpool "what do you expect? It's what he does"
They omitted...Even the BBC don't fucking know what Slimy Stone job role is.
In the last week depending on the article he's wrote he's either:
Manchester United reporter
Sports reporter
Chief football reporter
Absolute shambles
Dragging em off the street these daysWho the living fuk is fuking NOBBINS (on SSN as City fan ffs) You don't represent me you outrageous twat
From the bbcThe change in attitude from the media on this record spend from Liverpool is telling.
Everything being reported around it is positive. Not once have I heard the terms "obscene" or "ruining football" like if it had been ourselves.
Yes.Everytime I here about a dipper trying to leave Anfield im reminded of the film Alcatraz
Well Slot came in last season, took over a team that finished third and won them the league off the back of signing one player? Slots achievements last season wasn't money related which is what that quote is saying surely? ]From the bbc
“But Slot oversaw a phenomenal title triumph, driven on the back of his inheritance from Klopp and his own expertise in driving on the team to greater heights”
Pretty sure pep wasn’t given such homage
Chequebook manager wasn’t it ?
But there lies the difference.No offence JRB but if the same headline had been about us, after a summer of spending, many would have viewed it as a slight.