I could be wrong but I got the impression that Longsight's brief mention that Nick gave evidence against City in particular for that case earlier in the thread. Is what set him off.
On the assumption those few mentions made him have his fit. I got what Longsight was driving at, I think. Helping victims of abuse is no bad thing but if his singular motive was based on sticking it to City, then that is insincere and more than a little bit weird. I can just picture him trying to shoehorn FFP and sportswashing into it at great length before he's ushered out by security with the judge left shaking his head and looking bemused.
Does anyone else know why the judge say why he dismissed it?
It could well be me jumping to conclusions though, it might have had nothing to do with this thread, maybe there was other stuff going off on twitter. I don't really read his timeline.
It's obvious the whatsapp group read bluemoon though. Wasn it Rob and Nick on that podcast painting themselves as victims mentioning stuff that was being said on here?
It's why people should be careful about even joking about any form of retaliation. It's obvious what type of people they are. They'd have the forum taken down if they could and they'd take great pleasure in it. It just seems beyond personal for most of them at this point. I don't know how any of them can make out they are victims, they are goading our fanbase half the time and lying about the club constantly or atleast never correcting their "mistakes"(pick one).