And convince himself. That's who has fallen for it the most.Jordan is another know it all **** who uses language well to convince others he knows what he's talking about.
And convince himself. That's who has fallen for it the most.Jordan is another know it all **** who uses language well to convince others he knows what he's talking about.
Now i am under the impression that, `drawing the line` negotiation, it was UEFA who time locked the information for their own security and reduced the fine, with City not taking them to court over legality and dropping support for that Bosman lawyer who was arguing player contract effects of FFP,Spot on. There was another element to the 2014 stitch up as @Prestwich_Blue has elaborated on in the past.
Pre-2010 contracts were originally not considered part of the expenditure calculations as even UEFA deemed it unfair that clubs could be punished for expenditure contracted before FFP even existed. This was according to Annex XI of the FFP rules.
City asked UEFA 3 times if they were on track with their accounts and 3 times UEFA confirmed they were. City duly submitted their accounts and UEFA promptly changed the 'toolkit' (the method of calculating Annex XI exemptions) which dropped City in the shit. PB has pointed out that City would have failed FFP anyway but within mitigation limits. After UEFA's dirty trick City had suddenly failed FFP by a much bigger margin.
The subsequent 49 million Euros fine, two thirds of which was refunded as you correctly say, resulted in Khaldoon reluctantly left to 'take the pinch' but only on the basis of drawing a line under the matter for good. That's why when the last UEFA stitch up happened City refused Ceferin's offer of a limited punishment because it implied acceptance of guilt when City had done nothing wrong. City appealed to CAS and were exonerated of any financial wrongdoing leaving UEFA looking like the vindictive shower of shit they are.
On a side note Liverpool DID fail FFP in 2013 but got away with it because they failed to qualify for Europe that season so fell outside UEFA's remit for investigation and punishment and there was no Premier League version of FFP at that time.
To be fair to Jordan he just listed off Barnes, Tueart and Malcolm Allison & Joe Mercer's later 60s/early 70s team when having this discussion on Real Madrid & Barcelona being bigger draws than City could ever be, which surprised me as most genuinely think we failed to do anything of note before 2008.
The subject of how 'big' a football club is is never a set in stone narrative imo. It is subjective to the individuals own views on football & on what makes a football club, so I never understand why so many get riled up by it. There is no right or wrong answer as it only exists in the mind of the football fan giving the opinion.
Jordan is clearly given the role of the City basher in his Talk Sport duties, with Trevor Sinclair given the good cop narrative (to us). It is a formula they use across all their football debates & club discussions to garner clicks and interest in their shows, & it still amazes me how many across the football landscape fall for it. What I will say, is when he delves into FFP with clearly incorrect views on our history with it, it'd be nice to hear one of the posters on here such as @laserblue who just posted a great analysis of our 2014 'settlement', take him down piece by piece, but TS would never allow that to happen so it's a mute point.
Haha you'll not catch many with that 1/10. ;)I never listen to Talksport, but if as you say they have a City basher, do they also have anyone with a similar role to disrespect Utd, Liverpool and Chelsea, or is it only us?