which of these 'historical superclubs" have amazing atmospheres? Certainly none in the premier league.
100% - Anfield is actually a good place to go and hear pins drop after the tourists have stopped singing YAWN from their song sheets.It's a media-generated myth to provide contrast with the media-generated myths surrounding our support. Can't believe that even some of our own fans buy into it.
What a postI can't remember any other club getting such hostile coverage as City have had during a period of success. Chelsea got a lot of stick for a few years after their takeover and crisis clubs like West Ham have been mocked by the media for years but nothing as vitriolic as we have endured. A lot of it has been xenophobic and sometimes racist in nature, like the abuse Sterling took after he joined us from Liverpool. The abuse of our fans has been relentless. I don't have a problem with the loons on Twitter but so much of it has come from allegedly mainstream media like SKY, the BBC and broadsheet newspapers, and so much coverage has just been false information.
Have we got a name for the plastic bellend who wrote the article?
they cant wait to see him leave
Actually BlueMooners it looks as though it must be some sort of like fan agony aunts page or the like (apologies maybe I should have vetted this better before posting).Have we got a name for the plastic bellend who wrote the article?
To be fair @leithblue my original post was unintentionally misleading - my bad, stand down............It’s not an article, it’s a letter in their mailbox. Not sure why everyone’s getting quite so hysterical. If you don’t like it, write in yourself and argue.
As it happens, Football365 published an actual article in the week saying Pep’s comments were out of order.
Ok fair enough- - assumed it was an article, not just the inane ramblings of some fucking plastic dickhead (although that would describe most journalists too)It’s not an article, it’s a letter in their mailbox. Not sure why everyone’s getting quite so hysterical. If you don’t like it, write in yourself and argue.
As it happens, Football365 published an actual article in the week saying Pep’s comments were out of order.
£97.5 million Romelu Lukaku likes this post.Anyone know when Jack Grealish changed his name to "£100M Jack Grealish"
Only asking as that's what everyone in the media now call him
So does 'returned home for the love of the club Cristiano'.........£97.5 million Romelu Lukaku likes this post.
£97.5 million Romelu Lukaku likes this post.
I think the very brilliant and insightful Robbie Savage was at the service.Anyone know when Jack Grealish changed his name to "£100M Jack Grealish"
Only asking as that's what everyone in the media now call him
They have but they have also recouped a lot of money too and have a transfer surplus this Summer from selling players like Abraham and Zouma. The club to go after is United. They have spent the same as us over a decade and have been a lot less successful.Chelsea have spent an absolute fortune in the last couple of years. I think it was 250 million after their transfer ban was lifted, then they bought 97 million Lukaku. I do not once remember hearing Tyler mention it in the commentary yesterday at Spurs.
They have but they have also recouped a lot of money too and have a transfer surplus this Summer from selling players like Abraham and Zouma. The club to go after is United. They have spent the same as us over a decade and have been a lot less successful.
They have but they have also recouped a lot of money too and have a transfer surplus this Summer from selling players like Abraham and Zouma. The club to go after is United. They have spent the same as us over a decade and have been a lot less successful.
Just 39?We have a proud history compared to the Dippers , we didnt murder 39 innocent fans
Except for Pulisic and Kovacic. They have done well though with their buying and (especially) selling.I agree about Chelsea - the high spending was after no spending for a year