Media Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
warringtonblue said:
Spitty giving his wisdom before tonight’s game saying ”Chelsea are serial winners, they may not win the league every year but their Carabao cup record is second to non” really?
Click to expand...
Apart from City, Liverpool, Villa and United, he could be right?
 
Stockton Heath Blue said:
Someone on my LinkedIn feed quoted Syed as one of the most respected sports journalists referencing his article about Djokovic. Isn't he the tennis table cheat and sewer rats knobhead? Regardless, I was still thinking WTF.
Click to expand...
Syed is not even a journalist. As far as I know he has no relevant qualifications. He seems to be just another chancer who has been given a platform because he knows the right people in the London chattering classes. Judging by the stuff he writes he seems to have little or no knowledge of media law for example.
 
Did none of these arsewipes watch our game against these last time out?
If we dick them again none of these will ever mention this preview ever again like it never happened. Great they're blowing smoke up Chelseas arse.
 
Another article underhandedly (actually, pretty blatantly) questioning if we are ruining football

"Is this too much? Is it actually healthy for English football? Is the Premier League in danger of becoming another one-club division? A common response to all of this is that it’s no different to the dynasties of Liverpool and Manchester United over much longer periods of time. The reality is they are not the same." Blah blah blah....

Ste Tudor's article posted earlier, although actually written before this one, blows him away on every point he makes!


www.independent.co.uk

How Manchester City changed the way you win the league

Pep Guardiola’s all-conquering side have not only set a new standard in the Premier League, they have changed the very complexion of the competition, writes Miguel Delaney
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Brian's Kid said:
Another article underhandedly (actually, pretty blatantly) questioning if we are ruining football

"Is this too much? Is it actually healthy for English football? Is the Premier League in danger of becoming another one-club division? A common response to all of this is that it’s no different to the dynasties of Liverpool and Manchester United over much longer periods of time. The reality is they are not the same." Blah blah blah....

Ste Tudor's article posted earlier, although actually written before this one, blows him away on every point he makes!


www.independent.co.uk

How Manchester City changed the way you win the league

Pep Guardiola’s all-conquering side have not only set a new standard in the Premier League, they have changed the very complexion of the competition, writes Miguel Delaney
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
Click to expand...

Bizarre article even by Delooney's standards. Whilst couched in faint praise, it amounts to "how dare a club seek to achieve excellence, it's not fair". I like all the "some people say.." and "there's a feeling that..." all of which betrays the simple fact that, as a united fan, he's hurting. Long may it continue. Keep 'em coming Miguel, we love it.
 
Newman Noggs said:
Bizarre article even by Delooney's standards. Whilst couched in faint praise, it amounts to "how dare a club seek to achieve excellence, it's not fair". I like all the "some people say.." and "there's a feeling that..." all of which betrays the simple fact that, as a united fan, he's hurting. Long may it continue. Keep 'em coming Miguel, we love it.
Click to expand...
That's a great game actually ....

Some people say Delaney is a screaming bender with no more right to live on God's green Earth than a weasel.

There is a feeling that he must be getting paid to continually criticise City because there can be no other reason for such unashamed bullshittery.

Etc etc ...
 
kippaxwarrior said:
We might as well not turn up tomorrow as all 4 of these are convinced Chelsea should win as we've had a 2 week break

Click to expand...

Although it was pretty much all about Chelsea and the only real discussion about us was about our lack of striker. None of them seemed to say Chelsea would win, just they had a chance, because of x, y, z. My inference from that is that they thought City would win, unless basically City didnt play well.

I'd have liked the presenter to have ended it by asking who they thought would win.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top