What’s this all about certain clubs wanting to keep control or influence over the premier league and what key decisions get made,the government regulations will see them lose the power they hold very interesting indeed,more interesting that City seem to be the only club backing the regulations from the government..Rat face not happy with Martin SamuelView attachment 74585
Don't believe anything that comes out of that rag cunts mouth.Rat face not happy with Martin SamuelView attachment 74585
His other tweet about Samuel is quite a slating too, basically describing him as almost a pariah in his own profession. Ott, and pretty personal stuff tbh.Rat face not happy with Martin SamuelView attachment 74585
It certainly doesn’t seem like he’s necessarily the person he likes to portray.Make no mistake, ratboy is one horrible slippery snide ****.
He absolutely isn’t.It certainly doesn’t seem like he’s necessarily the person he likes to portray.
It is the same thing that always happens when the government goes cartel or monopoly busting. Those that are on the inside scream “this is unnecessary, onerous regulation” and those on the outside support it, as they have very little to lose and quite a bit to gain by a more level playing field.What’s this all about certain clubs wanting to keep control or influence over the premier league and what key decisions get made, the government regulations will see them lose the power they hold very interesting indeed, more interesting that City seem to be the only club backing the regulations from the government..
His other tweet about Samuel is a quite slating too, basically describing him as almost a pariah in his own profession. Ott, and pretty personal stuff tbh.
Regulation,control,scrutiny and sanctions are coming and City are be using soft influence to encourage and shape it.Pundits on sky kept mentioning that change is coming. Neville tweeting about it. They know the writing is on the wall
This all day.Make no mistake, ratboy is one horrible slippery snide ****.
Perfect description. But you missed out the word hypocrite (Qatar)This all day.
Don't be fooled by his tv persona, he's a rag mardarse and anti city gobshite like the other 600 billion of them out there.
Gets on my fucking wick with that shite.Love Ian Wright’s passion but that paid for analysis (“we” “us”) is grating
No he was only out there to highlight the issues to us - do keep up BW.......... ;-)Perfect description. But you missed out the word hypocrite (Qatar)
I can think of no higher compliment.His other tweet about Samuel is a quite slating too, basically describing him as almost a pariah in his own profession.
Rat face not happy with Martin SamuelView attachment 74585
It all feels too cosy to be true, no way does Sly & the PL part ways acrimoniously, both know where the bodies are, it could get really ugly. The PL will always need a broadcaster and platform to do the groundwork & can always offer Sly favourable rates to smooth things over (Virgin media operates similarly) PL football is their only USP these days. This just feels like a shot across the bows of those clubs supporting government regulation, with the PL incentivising viewing figures, which we all know would benefit the red shirtsLooking that way premier league want the rights all to themselves cut out the middle man
His limited intellect and poor judgement were brutally exposed when he hosted HIGNFY.Don’t mind Neville as a pundit but get the feeling he’s not as clever as he thinks he is.
His tweets on politics and football admin always seem to have the air of someone showing off but oblivious to his own hypocrisy.
I think he would do well to avoid trying to get in a debate with Martin Samuel as he would come off 2nd best.
I don't mind him showing his colours (so to speak) at all, why would you want a total lack of passion from every pundit? Are we not passionate about City?For years watching our games on various TV channels, we've had to put up with pundits drawn from the usual suspects.. United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea. And we've always had to put up with their partiality; sometimes their indifference; sometimes their hostility.
In recent years we have seen an increase in former Blues brought in to do the analyst's role but in the main we still get 'the usual suspects' most of the time.
What bugs me about Ian Wright's recent involvement in MOTD analyses of games involving Arsenal is his continual use of 'We/Us/Our' when putting his two penn'orth in.
The people at MOTD really should sort it out. Wright may be 'passionate' about his old club, I get that. But he should be professional in the role he's now in and control the 'We/Us/Our' claptrap.