Media thread 2022/23

[Gingers Dad]

In fact the article has no reporter attributed to it

 

[Bald fraud]

Imagine if the rags had just beaten the German champions in a game where they could have scored at least another four or five goals! There would literally be 17 articles on it on the daily Mail app!

 

[nmc]

A. ****.
That was the signature I spotted….

Plenty of them at the Beeb starting with the Director General.

 

[Maly]

https://www.skysports.com/football/...d-off-the-mark-as-man-city-grow-global-appeal

Extremely positive report from Sky :)

 

[nmc]

They are a national disgrace, fucking hate them.

I have decided to make a freedom of information request to find out how much Simon Stones jolly with the Rags has cost….

 

[mad4city]

https://www.skysports.com/football/...d-off-the-mark-as-man-city-grow-global-appeal

Extremely positive report from Sky :)

Sure but did you see the font they used? Arial sans serif...
If that was United or Liverpool, they'd have used Arial AVEC serif!!
;-)

 

[JASR]

Echo will be penning a why City beating Munich is good for Liverpool.

At least they mention us!!

‘City beating Bayern shows Liverpool were incredibly brilliant selling Mane’

 

[threespires]

The season hasn't even started and we are discussing bias. The reality appears to be that we will be unfairly/under reported until one of the following happens.

1. The analytics tell them it is no longer good business to denigrate or ignore us.

2. Editorial positions change towards us as a result of different personnel or strategies.tied to the above.

3. The club gets aggressive or litigious, though this will only resolve egregious errors not general bias.

4. Something else I've missed.

In the absence of these things happening this thread has evolved mostly into a mechanism for us to blow off steam, catalogue our grievances. This is a legitimate reason for a thread but I wonder if there is merit in splitting it into more than one thread?

At the moment we have the occasional other media discussion in with lots of posts pointing out that Delaney or Harris etc aren't playing with a full deck, or commentary on the BBC/Stone all of which we've known for quite some time and probably won't change anytime soon.

Not saying this isn't legitimate commentary/opinion just wonder if it's time to split this out in some way, shape or form? I do recognise that an 'agenda' thread runs the risk of feeding the narrative that we are paranoid but maybe it can be framed in different terms?

 

[Petetheblu]

The Media thought "if they told lies about us, belittled every bit of hard work and success we had and created a vacuum of hate full of untrust and bordering racism, we'd just go away".

Now we're at the point where they think "if we just ignore them, they'll go away"...

Reality is going to sting like 'gravel rash' in a hot shower when they awake to find us still here.

It should and would be funny.....if it wasn't so embarrassingly childish, they're grown men and women after all.

Anyhow, 20 years ago we'd have chopped our left legs off to be in this position, so don't let a few petulant pricks ruin it, just enjoy this ride and furthermore enjoy your Sunday, with the family.

Especially you Ric.... ;^)

Keep smiling Blues.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

https://www.skysports.com/football/...d-off-the-mark-as-man-city-grow-global-appeal

Extremely positive report from Sky :)

This bit is just a little disagreeable - like he is a Norse God in the mould of Thor. Truth be told, Thor is a Norse God in the mould of Haaland