Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn’t they also have the most expensive quartet of strikers in world football at the time?
Most of the United 1999 team was bought and included big transfer fees at the time for Keane, Sheringham, Cole, Yorke, Stam for starters. It is just a bloody myth that United didn't spend big. They shattered the transfer record every season. They also bought Irwin, Solskjaer, and Schmeichel. Google is a useful tool for exposing some of the dishonest hacks.
 
If we do win the treble we will do it with more points, more goals scored, less conceded, having put six past them and four past Liverpool. We will have beaten Arsenal to the title, Bayern, Real Madrid, and probably AC Milan. We will have won the first ever all-Manchester FA Cup Final. Our leading player will have scored more than 50 goals. Apparently this will not compare with United's huge league tally of 79 points. Whatever!
When you put it like that…
 
Most of the United 1999 team was bought and included big transfer fees at the time for Keane, Sheringham, Cole, Yorke, Stam for starters. It is just a bloody myth that United didn't spend big. They shattered the transfer record every season. They also bought Irwin, Solskjaer, and Schmeichel. Google is a useful tool for exposing some of the dishonest hacks.

They took Newcastle’s best striker off them in Andy Cole and also paired him up with the very prolific Dwight Yorke taken from Aston Villa. When these two hit a brick wall in the final they could then send on Teddy Sheringham (ex Spurs). Utter revisionism from the raggy mouth piece.
 
Organically?

About ten years after they’d stacked the deck in their favour? Using the money that move had bestowed upon them to break transfer record after transfer record? To use the domestic income and glory that provided to guarantee qualification for a recalibrated European Cup, the revised finances for which helped further cement the gap between them and those their machinations had left behind?

There was fuck all ‘organic’ about united’s treble win in 1999. It was the culmination of a series of conscious commercial moves to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of a few clubs, of which united would be at the apex. It was as a result of united et al creating a landscape where they would take revenue away from other clubs in order to widen the gap between them. A decision to break a convention of wealth distribution in football that had lasted a century.

The fact that the team that won the treble had quite a few youth players is merely a sideshow to the main event.

And the irony is, which Herbert’s tiny mind will manifestly struggle to comprehend, is the City model that he so despairs of, arose from what United did in the late 80s and early 90s. The treble win in ’99 was a staging post in the journey to the club City are today.

People say that Pep wouldn’t have come to City if it wasn’t for all the money, and whilst there’s an undeniable truth in that, it’s equally correct to say Mansour wouldn’t have bought the club if united and their cohort hadn’t been such greedy cunts 30 years ago, making the opportunities for commercial revenue from English football so enticing.

The Cambridge Online Dictionary defines ‘organic‘ (inter alia) as follows:
happening or developing naturally over time, without being forced or planned by anyone


The cunts certainly didn’t plan for what happened to City; that seems pretty organic to me.
Bizarre that paid hands deploy and mis-use the term across the board without challenge...........
 
Organically?

About ten years after they’d stacked the deck in their favour? Using the money that move had bestowed upon them to break transfer record after transfer record? To use the domestic income and glory that provided to guarantee qualification for a recalibrated European Cup, the revised finances for which helped further cement the gap between them and those their machinations had left behind?

There was fuck all ‘organic’ about united’s treble win in 1999. It was the culmination of a series of conscious commercial moves to concentrate more and more wealth in the hands of a few clubs, of which united would be at the apex. It was as a result of united et al creating a landscape where they would take revenue away from other clubs in order to widen the gap between them. A decision to break a convention of wealth distribution in football that had lasted a century.

The fact that the team that won the treble had quite a few youth players is merely a sideshow to the main event.

And the irony is, which Herbert’s tiny mind will manifestly struggle to comprehend, is the City model that he so despairs of, arose from what United did in the late 80s and early 90s. The treble win in ’99 was a staging post in the journey to the club City are today.

People say that Pep wouldn’t have come to City if it wasn’t for all the money, and whilst there’s an undeniable truth in that, it’s equally correct to say Mansour wouldn’t have bought the club if united and their cohort hadn’t been such greedy cunts 30 years ago, making the opportunities for commercial revenue from English football so enticing.

The Cambridge Online Dictionary defines ‘organic‘ (inter alia) as follows:
happening or developing naturally over time, without being forced or planned by anyone

The cunts certainly didn’t plan for what happened to City; that seems pretty organic to me.
Oh and great post by the way..........
 
It’s the old “ build em up to knock em down” routine
They’ve being doing it since the day we we taken over.
Nothing will ever change with the media
Most of them don’t even believe what they write but it generates more income to piggyback the old guard.
It’s always about the money which is ironic all things considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.