Media thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is the point that is always lost. United and Chelsea were allowed to spend unlimited funds and run up huge debts to enable them to win trophies and no one else could compete with them. The rules were changed purely to stop us. The idea that United's spending was organic is just ridiculous. Their owners (even before the Glazers) ran up huge debts and didn't put a penny back into the local community or the club's infrastructure. Their debts have grown not been reduced. Their model is totally unsustainable but is approved by the PL which frowns on owner investment.

Also the present ffp was written up and introduced in record time by no other the that slimy kunt Gill a die hard rag the impartiality was there from the start with premier ffp and he changed it revamped it so many times since it was introduced, one of those changes helped his club and was a way of curtailing wages increases!
 
Have any of these "journalists" come up with an actual reason why 1999 rags were better? Other than just rag-bias?

City 2023 have far more PL points, reached the FA Final without conceding and reached the CL Final by destroying Bayern and Real Madrid.

We've scored 3 or more goals 21 times this season, including in games against Chelsea, Liverpool, Arsenal, Rags, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.

By every measure possible, there shouldn't even be an argument.

They could at least let us win the fookin' thing first, before "reporting" on how shit it is.
The rags conceded 2 goals against juventus and got twatted in the final by Bayern so it’s the bestest cl win ever. 3-2 is a more convincing win than 4-0 if you’re a knobjockey stealing a living like oli holt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.