Kinkybyname
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 2,991
- Team supported
- Manchester City
With a 10 FPS motor drive camera and a long lens they could have posted a picture of them all smiling. They would have had 100's of pictures to choose from but they choose this one.Not the best picture TBH.
Stern and lack of emotion looking. At that moment.
Exactly what the City hating media want to see.
At least the picture taker got the money shot and won't have to work for the foreseeable future
View attachment 82907
Very often, the headline and summary can be different to the body of the article. Someone in the industry explained that previously, as the editors choosing not the writers. If more people out there read the full thing (of some of the articles, not all), the headlines maybe wouldn't stick as much.
Either way, people will most likely either read the whole thing or not, regardless of whether there is a link to it or not, so it is a bit of a niche argument.
Can we make this a pinned post IN CAPITALS so it’s the first thing everyone sees. We’ve got to stop feeding the mediaYour monthly reminder to…
STOP POSTING LINKS TO NEGATIVE ARTICLES ABOUT CITY
If you must share them for some reason, post a screenshot (of only the headline and summary paragraph, anything more will be deleted to avoid copyright claims against the forum).
Posting the link just gives them more engagement, which is exactly what they want, only serving to incentivise more negative articles in the future.
I am convinced that half of the negative articles written about City get most of their engagement from City fans rage-sharing them on here, Twitter, Reddit, and elsewhere.
YesGet fucked, we need conflict and the media are it.
Should we stop clicks to the site?