See the Daily mail have put it out there .......... and the reaction in there Facebook feed is something they probably wasn’t expecting:) rather it being condoned the masses have actually pulled the victims to bits on it .........Munich songs ....... songs about the dead queen are fine in Victimland but lone behold anyone mention there murdering past is put up on trial ........... so please Fook off the media the majority of football fans are starting to see through this crap now
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Media thread 2022/23
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Why single out City, PSG and Newcastle for their spending when Man United's (net) spend surpasses that of those 3 clubs? If we take the last 3 years, where are City net spend wise? Probably not in the top 5 in Europe.
Because he doesn't think they are spending unlimited money.
If the Panamanian sovereign wealth fund and the Norweigian sovereign wealth fund bought Burnley and Fulham respectively and invested a few billion, knocking Liverpool down the table, do you think Klopp would be OK with it?
No, of course he wouldn't. Because he doesn't have anything against people from the Middle East, he has a problem with what he thinks is overinvestment from owners with essentially limitless wealth.
How do we know that's his problem? Because he literaly spent 20 fucking minutes explaining his problem on Friday in the press conference apparently none of you accusing him of xenophobia bothered to watch.
Like I said very clearly in my original comment, lots of criticism of City over the years has had an anti-arab or islamaphobic bent to it, but this categorically didn't and it's completely dishonest to pretend otherwise.
I know tensions are high after yesterday but I can't believe people are seriously arguing that Klopp is prejudiced against Arabs/the Middle East.
Why?
Dirty Harry
Well-Known Member
Or the rags ?He lumped us, PSG and Newcastle together even though we have different ways of going about things. Wonder what the connection was?
Don't remember him complaining so loudly about Chelsea's finances...
stan bowles
Well-Known Member
Just like their crowd and the fabled Anfield atmosphere. Only turns up against us.If I was a Liverpool fan I’d feel cheated by their performances this season. Only turn up for one big game and shite the rest of the time.
Klopp (and FSG) knows City have complied with FFP over the last decade.
Klopp knows City can only spend what the club makes, just like Liverpool, United, etc.
Therefore Klopp is a liar.
He is continuing his and FSG's narrative that City spend more than any other club becuase they have unlimted money from an wealthy Arab country, which a Liverpool fans lap up. What Klopp says is the truth.(no it's not)
When was the last time Klopp criticised Henry, FSG, or another (red shirt) club owned by a Billionaire Yank for spending money?
Klopp knows City can only spend what the club makes, just like Liverpool, United, etc.
Therefore Klopp is a liar.
He is continuing his and FSG's narrative that City spend more than any other club becuase they have unlimted money from an wealthy Arab country, which a Liverpool fans lap up. What Klopp says is the truth.(no it's not)
When was the last time Klopp criticised Henry, FSG, or another (red shirt) club owned by a Billionaire Yank for spending money?
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 13,340
Because he doesn't think they are spending unlimited money.
He doesn't think we are, either, he knows that we spend within our income, or within a tolerated margin of it. Like every other club that is subject to FFP without contravening it.
So why would he make an allegation against us that he knows to be untrue? And why would he single out just three clubs, all run in different ways, all owned by individuals or groups that hail from the middle east?
BlueMoonz1977
Well-Known Member
And even the days after the hostility increases with the sports media helping towards
I spoke with a Liverpool fan today, about the toxicity that is growing between our 2 fan bases.
He actually thinks it is us trying to manufacture a rivalry- I closed this down straight away stating this is the last thing us City fans have done. With the rags being our one and only rivals.
I put it too him that since Liverpool started challenging, it leans more towards them, their actions over the last few years (which we all know about) and the sports media creating a hatred towards our club that have created this level of toxicity
As someone said earlier today, it seems it will only get worse, and the sports media are revelling in it.
I spoke with a Liverpool fan today, about the toxicity that is growing between our 2 fan bases.
He actually thinks it is us trying to manufacture a rivalry- I closed this down straight away stating this is the last thing us City fans have done. With the rags being our one and only rivals.
I put it too him that since Liverpool started challenging, it leans more towards them, their actions over the last few years (which we all know about) and the sports media creating a hatred towards our club that have created this level of toxicity
As someone said earlier today, it seems it will only get worse, and the sports media are revelling in it.
Neville backed up his claim during the commentary yesterday too - city should be calling out that wanker as wellKlopp (and FSG) knows City have complied with FFP over the last decade.
Klopp knows City can only spend what the club makes, just like Liverpool, United, etc.
Therefore Klopp is a liar.
He is continuing his and FSG's narrative that City spend more than any other club becuase they have unlimted money from an wealthy Arab country, which a Liverpool fans lap up. What Klopp says is the truth.(no it's not)
When was the last time Klopp criticised Henry, FSG, or another (red shirt) club owned by a Billionaire Yank for spending money?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.