Yes, my point may have been technically esoteric, but it nonplusses dippers and rags.So, yes, he’s not on the Manchester City list of directors, but he is the owner of the controlling company (with 2 more companies in between) of Manchester City.
The correspondence address is an ongoing reason, probably, why we are still labelled ‘state owned’, if it was changed to his private companies headquarters (if one exists), or any of his private residencies (can you send letters to a yacht?!?), it might be useful, to knock another (wrong) plank of bullshit off the agenda.