Did you go into the Yorkshire rippers lair though?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Jackson
Did you go into the Yorkshire rippers lair though?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
I think he means in the court of public opinion rather than law.Not sure you have much understanding of law.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
Not sure you have much understanding of law.
As @SWP's back says I don’t mean a £2m payment to a cleaner definitively proves guilt in a court of law but surely even you would question why he did it?
S
S
SVP
Guest
Cleaned the bog well?As @SWP's back says I don’t mean a £2m payment to a cleaner definitively proves guilt in a court of law but surely even you would question why he did it?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Kept picking his facial features up off the floor and cleaning them for him?Cleaned the bog well?
S
S
SVP
Guest
No idea what you mean ?- complicated subject not for bluemoon thats for sure.Kept picking his facial features up off the floor and cleaning them for him?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,064
He’s means his face kept falling off as it was plastic.No idea what you mean ?- complicated subject not for bluemoon thats for sure.
S
S
SVP
Guest
I suppose everything in life is black and white?He’s means his face kept falling off as it was plastic.
or bald and full head of hair?
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
As @SWP's back says I don’t mean a £2m payment to a cleaner definitively proves guilt in a court of law but surely even you would question why he did it?
I would indeed. But you said “prove or disprove” and I was making the point that the law requires much stronger, more direct evidence. Which is why certain individuals manage to carry on doing what they do for so long.
johnmc
Well-Known Member
I would indeed. But you said “prove or disprove” and I was making the point that the law requires much stronger, more direct evidence. Which is why certain individuals manage to carry on doing what they do for so long.
Not sure if we are getting crossed wires here. I was saying it would be easy to prove/disprove a £2m payment. Via a bank statement for example. Or even just a serious upturn in tangibles without explanation
You could join the dots thereafter.