lightning Rodri
Well-Known Member
Not really, it is written in plain enough English for me to understand.And anyone who likes Plain English.
Not really, it is written in plain enough English for me to understand.And anyone who likes Plain English.
Bill Bryson describes jargon thus: “The practice of never calling a spade a spade when you might instead call it a manual earth-restructuring implement”Not really, it is written in plain enough English for me to understand.
Plenty of hawkish politicians demanding a strike on Iran.Havent been following this but it must be very worrying now the yanks are getting involved with attacks
Thats clearly the objective. Completely levelling Gaza for an israeli rebuild and occupation. beyond despicable. **** should be hanged.
This obdurate, angry and irrational Israel is exactly what Hamas dreamed of.The state of Israel is in a state of collective madness at the moment thrashing around and beginning to alienate itself from its biggest backers, it seems the preferred solution is a one state solution where the Palestinians are always second class citizens a watered down apartheid system, and they think that would fly with the rest of the world, many Israelis are starting to realise this
Havent been following this but it must be very worrying now the yanks are getting involved with attacks
The US have been hitting bases used by Iran since this whole thing kicked off. Today is nothing unusual. They are actually being quite reserved in the grand scheme of things. Seems to be when US personel get hurt that the hit back.
Supporting actors and extras each with a stationary pose, in particular that one who was seated in a vajrasana position (sp?).
Statistics Show That Israel Has Successfully Minimized Gazan Civilian Casualties
A law school Dean published the below. Curious to know this sub's opinions. Any civilian casualty on either side is a regrettable tragedy in its own right but this statistical analysis seems to show that Israel has done a good job minimizing civilian casualties compared to other conflicts.
Set aside the unreliability of figures provided by Hamas--a terrorist organization that falsely accused Israel of killing 500 civilians with a rocket that was actually fired by Gazan militants. Even taken at face value, it is worth putting Hamas' figures in "context" (a favorite word of Israel's critics).
1. It's been reported that 67% of Gazans killed have been women and children. [https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...ted-conflict-gaza-experts/story?id=104655493). But according to a 2022 UN report, in a typical war, 90% of casualties are civilians. [https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14904.doc.htm](https://press.un.org/en/2022/sc14904.doc.htm). Israel is actually causing fewer civilian deaths than in the typical conflict, notwithstanding the dense urban environment.
2. Upwards of 5,500 Gazan casualties--nearly 1/3 the total--are reported to be children. [https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/11/22...gaza-hostilities-take-horrific-toll-children). What is not reported is how many of those "children" are boys 17 and under carrying automatic rifles, and thus legitimate enemy combatants. Plus, over 1/2 Gaza's population is under 18. [. So fewer minors are dying than one would expect if Israel were indiscriminately killing civilians.
3. What civilians typically do to survive a war is...leave. In Ukraine, within a month of Russia's invasion, nearly 1/2 of the population had left their homes and 1/4 had left the country--some 14 million people. [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukr...wiki/Ukrainian_refugee_crisis_(2022–present)). But neighboring Arab states have refused to accept Palestinian refugees. They claim if they do, Israel might make Gazans' displacement permanent--a curious concern, given that Israel voluntarily left Gaza in 2005 and even forcibly evicted 9,000 Jewish residents. [https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/o...tes-disengagement-from-the-gaza-strip-679288). One would think a theoretical risk of displacement is better than a real risk of dying. Since Gazans can't or won't flee, the civilian death toll necessarily climbs, and Israel--not Hamas--continues to be blamed.
4. Responses to unprovoked attacks often cause more deaths than the attacks themselves. That doesn't make the response illegitimate. The 9/11 attacks killed 3,000 American civilians. ([https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cas.../wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks)) In the Aghan war that followed, between 46,000 and 360,000 civilians died. ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil...alties_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan_(2001–2021))).
The author concludes: The hatred of Israel is what's disproportionate, not Israel's response. No other nation would respond differently. Yet no other nation is as hated. Antisemitism, not body count, makes the difference.
I don't understand the significance of the 1 in 27 deaths are civilian in Ukraine. Why look at a single conflict that isn't even necessarily comparable in terms of war e.g. close urban combat whereas ukraine includes vast open space fighting as well?
shouldn't we look at a wider aggregate of civilian death rate? that's what the 90% figure was supposed to do.
News media are referring to what’s happening in Ukraine as genocide and condemning Russia for its killing of civilians.
When we say this about Israel it’s antisemitic, despite the numbers in Gaza being significantly worse
There was a time in this thread, that a few skeptics discredited the possibility of some of the killings in Kibbutz was by irresponsible IDF.
Channel 12 Israel news actually have interviews with ACTUAL Kibbutz survivors. Of how, even houses without the presence of Hamas, IDF fired tank shells on houses, killing the Israelis there.
It is utterly irresponsible by the IDF. Why didn’t they just call by phone each house to make sure who is who instead of repeatedly shelling.
Channel 12 Israel have actually been conducting interviews with Israeli Kibbutz survivors and released hostages, but the narrative by Channel i24, which is pro IDF, drowns out the news of first-hand Israelis.
I support any democracies right to exist.One side is committing genocide. The other is terrorist. Their fault, his fault whatever. You support a genocidal regime? Like other support a terrorist regime. Taking sides really shows very ones true colours, no one gives a shite about the deaths whilst you point score. All you "fans" of one side or the other are just as bad as the despots in charge of them.
Absolute nonsense. These attempts to tar those engaging in political criticism of the Israeli government with the anti-Semitism brush are doing nobody any favours.Of course many on here will want that as they want Isreal to cease to exist. Of course that will mean the death of 9m Jews but they don't give a shit about them.