Missing woman Nicola Bulley - inquest (P 158)

[Gray]

I can only guess thats a false reading mate.
I also still think the reading is above summer (or a low) level.
On some gauges I use last summer gave minus readings in the drought... and the rivers were not dry.

That is because they use a fixed point in the river.

 

[The slaughtered lamb]

Today at St. Michael’s it is 0.38m, however upstream round the bend near the top field (Catterall) it is 7.01m. Very strange the difference in such a short stretch

Those readings must have been taken at a specific point where the river isn’t very deep. At 6:18 in this video, Peter Faulding says it was about 4m deep, a few steps from the river bank in the area where the bench was, “so deep enough to drown in”. Sorry for the link to gbnews.

 

[Gray]

Those readings must have been taken at a specific point where the river isn’t very deep. At 6:18 in this video, Peter Faulding says it was about 4m deep, a few steps from the river bank in the area where the bench was, “so deep enough to drown in”. Sorry for the link to gbnews.

I am sure that is the reason. If they have a gauge like at reservoirs and it is near the bank then they will get lower readings. Makes you wonder why they bother?

 

[M18]

I sense some people may have watched too many ITV dramas. Leave it to the experts.

 

[Gray]

I sense some people may have watched too many ITV dramas. Leave it to the experts.

It is going to make a TV drama in the future.

 

[cleavers]

I am sure that is the reason. If they have a gauge like at reservoirs and it is near the bank then they will get lower readings. Makes you wonder why they bother?

The guage will be at the weir, so it might be measuring the height of water going over the weir not the depth behind it.


(I think the 7m reading round the corner is false, as there is another link you can clich which says this gauge has not provided a reading since 24-11-2021, it looks like it broke on 18-11-2021 when it jumped from -5.98m to +9.0m, you can click the "graph options" and change it to a year at a time.)

 

[ActonBlue]

Or you are simply sat at a bench on your phone and you see something happen and place it down in a hurry, in fact it is the most logical conclusion.

 

[Tuearts right boot]

How many more times....she never went in the river !!

 

[snorky]

How many more times....she never went in the river !!

Sorry mate, but there is only one way you know this.

 

[ActonBlue]

Not been following the case closely but do they have any CCTV coverage/eyewitness accounts of her being on the Riverside in or around the time she went missing ? Not like me to get all conspiracy theorist but is it possible an accomplice could have planted the evidence, took her dog, left the phone there, so she was never on the riverbank in the first place. Didnt they have a lot of failed businesses against their name, could it be a way of extricating her way out of that'. Life insurance job. By the way I've been Friday drinking so liable to be talking b0ll0cks